But evolution doesn't start with nothing. It starts with an existing organism that adapts to changing ecologies & opportunities or dies.
nothing was in reference to the machine not the organism
And when we switch the topic to abiogenesis and the development of a possible first life, with only the requirements for a very simple self-replicating system, then you would have to show that an IC system would be required for that (and which could not come together with the same processes that developed life). And we won't know that until life is generated eh?
isnt that an origin of life topic?
This is precisely what is falsified by the experiment. Natural selection eliminates parts that are deleterious or lethal, but it is indifferent to ones that are neutral.
This is completely not true. thus why evolutionists claim that we are losing "unnecessary" biological parts
Evolutionary Loss of Useless Features
survival of the fittest means eliminating everything that isnt fit, and by its very nature eliminating parts that dont benefit the body immediately
Life is not machines. If you have 1% of an organism, but it is independently alive and can replicate then it will continue to evolve. Look at what "machines" evolved from the basic prokaryotes (after a billion years slow start).
youre making statements based on your assumptions! that would be like me saying look at how great God is because He made all of this; while this is what I believe i dont make that statement because you dont believe He did, so it means nothing to you.
Edited by AdminNosy, : to shorten the URL
Edited by AdminNosy, : to better title the link