sonnikke, not expecting a response, writes:
According to the Creation model God created male and female (humans & animals) and told them to be fruitful and multiply. Is that what we observe? yes.
According to Creation there were two sexes created, is that what we observe? yes.
According to Creation male and female were made to compliment each other and be attracted to each other, is that what we observe? yes.
Unfortunately for your "goddidit" assertion, the actual observations of the natural world contradict your simplistic "two sexes created He" model. Setting aside the facts that all prokaryotes and single-celled eukaryotes are asexual clones, and the vast number of plants that reproduce asexually, there are huge numbers of metazoans that are also clonal. From ostracods to corals to numerous insect species the examples of single-sex reproduction are myriad. Even in higher organisms examples abound: the entire greenfish family (Aspidochirotidae), naked mole rats (
Heterocephalus glaber), whiptail lizards (
Cnemidophorus spp.), several geckos (such as
Christinus marmoratus,
Lepidodactylus lugubris,
Hemidactylus garnotti, etc) and so on. Moreover, there are examples of asexual insects, for instance, that are parthenogenetic (asexual) due to the action of parasites.
Wolbachia and the wasp
Asobara tabida spring to mind.
Wolbachia usurps your deity's "two sex" scenario by forcing its host to produce only females.
"Goddidit" is such a simple explanation. Too bad it doesn't match reality.
(edited to fix formatting)
[This message has been edited by Quetzal, 03-18-2003]