Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,423 Year: 3,680/9,624 Month: 551/974 Week: 164/276 Day: 4/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   New Years day or Proclamation vs Cutting it short
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 1 of 32 (569696)
07-23-2010 9:55 AM


Traditionally in the Western World the New Year has started on two different dates, March 25th or January 1st. Both are based on the Christian tradition, but why were they selected?
Well, March 25th is easy. It is the Feast of the Annunciation, when the angel told Mary that she was gonna get a night time visitor. It is the very beginning of the Jesus story and so a good place to start the calendar.
But why January 1st? Why was what happened that day important?
Most likely in Faith and Belief.
Edited by jar, : No reason given.
Edited by jar, : appalin spallin

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Larni, posted 07-23-2010 12:13 PM jar has replied
 Message 16 by RAZD, posted 07-23-2010 9:08 PM jar has replied

  
AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 2 of 32 (569706)
07-23-2010 12:06 PM


Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread copied here from the New Years day or Proclamation vs Cutting it short thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 3 of 32 (569708)
07-23-2010 12:13 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by jar
07-23-2010 9:55 AM


A quick wiki search suggest the Romans used the 1st of January as the date a new consul was appointed. This became the new year apart from in the Middle Ages when it was the 25th of March as you note (new to me).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by jar, posted 07-23-2010 9:55 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by jar, posted 07-23-2010 12:23 PM Larni has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 4 of 32 (569709)
07-23-2010 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Larni
07-23-2010 12:13 PM


Well, the Romans did celebrate it on January 1 but that was not the reason the Western Christian nations adopted January 1st.
There is a hint in the topic title.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Larni, posted 07-23-2010 12:13 PM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Larni, posted 07-23-2010 1:13 PM jar has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 5 of 32 (569710)
07-23-2010 12:23 PM


"Cutting it short".
I figured it out once that January 1st was the eighth day of Jesus' life, the day He was circumcised.
Luke 2:21 writes:
And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.

I rode off into the sunset, went all the way around the world and now I\'m back where I started.

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by jar, posted 07-23-2010 12:31 PM ringo has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 6 of 32 (569712)
07-23-2010 12:31 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by ringo
07-23-2010 12:23 PM


Yes. It is Circumcision Day.
Hit wrong key.
It was important because it was the day that a child was finally expected to live, was named and also was accepted as a member of the Faith.
Edited by jar, : hit key too soon.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by ringo, posted 07-23-2010 12:23 PM ringo has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Buzsaw, posted 07-27-2010 10:15 AM jar has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 7 of 32 (569717)
07-23-2010 1:13 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by jar
07-23-2010 12:23 PM


There is a hint in the topic title.
My bad.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by jar, posted 07-23-2010 12:23 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by jar, posted 07-23-2010 1:23 PM Larni has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 8 of 32 (569721)
07-23-2010 1:23 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Larni
07-23-2010 1:13 PM


No problem.
The two dates were chosen as the start of a year for very Christian reasons, but I would hazard a guess that even most Christians were unaware of the reasons. They are important though, even today. For example, many Christians today condemn abortion based on a Biblical basis, yet Biblically, even a child, born and breathing was not considered as fully living and human until it lived at least a week and a day. It was only then, when the odds of the child living had improved, that the child was considered human and nameable.
So when the day rolls around next year and fireworks light the night time sky, be sure to remember that what we are really celebrating is a Circumcision.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Larni, posted 07-23-2010 1:13 PM Larni has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by ringo, posted 07-23-2010 3:14 PM jar has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 9 of 32 (569735)
07-23-2010 3:14 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by jar
07-23-2010 1:23 PM


I figured it out as a smart-ass argument that millenia start at the year 0 and not the year 1. According to tradition, Jesus was circumcised on January 1st of the year 1 CE. He was born on December 25th of the year 1 BCE, which could also be thought of as the year 0 CE. So He was 1 year old on December 25th of the year 1 CE and 2000 years old on December 25th of the year 2000.
Of course, all of that is predicated on the assumption that it's His birth that counts, which turns out to be wrong. It's His circumcision that counts as His "beginning".
In the Old Testament, circumcision was a sign of God's covenant with the children of Israel. In the New Testament, Jesus (supposedly) became the sign of a new covenant (or the new sign of an old covenant). I think there's even some talk in the epistles about Jesus being the "new circumcision" or something like that.
Edited by Ringo, : Circumcised "circumsision".

I rode off into the sunset, went all the way around the world and now I\'m back where I started.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by jar, posted 07-23-2010 1:23 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by jar, posted 07-23-2010 3:40 PM ringo has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 10 of 32 (569739)
07-23-2010 3:40 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by ringo
07-23-2010 3:14 PM


Ringo writes:
Of course, all of that is predicated on the assumption that it's His birth that counts, which turns out to be wrong. It's His circumcision that counts as His "beginning".
His circumcision was not really the beginning rather that was the day when he became a Person, was Named, became part of the religion and tribe. The circumcision was part of the ritual recognizing those things.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by ringo, posted 07-23-2010 3:14 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by ringo, posted 07-23-2010 4:10 PM jar has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 11 of 32 (569745)
07-23-2010 4:10 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by jar
07-23-2010 3:40 PM


jar writes:
His circumcision was not really the beginning rather that was the day when he became a Person, was Named, became part of the religion and tribe. The circumcision was part of the ritual recognizing those things.
There also seems to be a parallel with the creation of mankind "in the beginning" and mankind's "coming of age" in the Garden of Eden story.

I rode off into the sunset, went all the way around the world and now I\'m back where I started.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by jar, posted 07-23-2010 3:40 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by jar, posted 07-23-2010 5:35 PM ringo has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 12 of 32 (569756)
07-23-2010 5:35 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by ringo
07-23-2010 4:10 PM


Possibly but I'm not sure I see that.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by ringo, posted 07-23-2010 4:10 PM ringo has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Huntard, posted 07-23-2010 8:32 PM jar has replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2316 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 13 of 32 (569792)
07-23-2010 8:32 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by jar
07-23-2010 5:35 PM


Is there not also the issue of "the first shedding of the blood of Christ"?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by jar, posted 07-23-2010 5:35 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by jar, posted 07-23-2010 8:44 PM Huntard has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 14 of 32 (569795)
07-23-2010 8:44 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Huntard
07-23-2010 8:32 PM


From the middle ages all the way into the mid 1700s that was an important point, creating parallels with the crucifixion.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Huntard, posted 07-23-2010 8:32 PM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Huntard, posted 07-23-2010 8:48 PM jar has not replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2316 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 15 of 32 (569798)
07-23-2010 8:48 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by jar
07-23-2010 8:44 PM


Yeah, thought so.
Wanted to post "'twas penis mutilation day!", when I first saw your proposed topic, but then I did some other stuff and was beaten to it by Ringo.
Damn you Ringo, coming back and stealing my spotlight!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by jar, posted 07-23-2010 8:44 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by ringo, posted 07-23-2010 9:17 PM Huntard has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024