Circular reasoning

Are you saying you don't understand the similarities that Crashfrog is trying to show you? Crashfrog's entire posts are about Crashfrog. Crashfrog, throughout his posts, is portrayed as the Ultimate authority. How can you read Crashfrog's posts and also not agree that according to them, Crashfrog is the ultimate authority? No, I do not understand this. Why would it be true?
Would you understand that Crashfrog rules the universe if he claimed to have created it?
I don't think you would. So why does such a thing work for God? But none of this has been demonstrated. It's only written on some paper like many other stories. Like Jumped Up Chimpanzee's claims. Like Crashfrog's claims.
Why do you demand that Crashfrog must demonstrate himself outside of his writings, while God does not have to demonstrate himself outside of His writings? "One" is simply asking for the same demonstrations from God that you are demanding from Crashfrog. That is all.

In circles? Even though it is about circular reasoning, we should try to move forward, not get stuck in the same misunderstandings. No, I'm attempting to show you how useless your non-demonstrations of God's authority are. They are as useless as crashfrog's. "False" is not a demonstration, it is an assertion. You are only proving that it has still not been demonstrated. Great. Where? How? This does not prove God's character. Nor is it any sort of demonstration of God's authority.
These people may not be mad, no one has claimed that they were. They're just wrong. People are wrong about things like this all the time. In fact, even if your chosen theology is correct, the majority of the world would have to wrong in exactly this way because they accept a different religious authority. Therefore, using this as a demonstration of God's authority is actually a logical contradiction as it is used by a majority of others for a variety of mutually exclusive ideas. Oh no, not blunt face rejected. Only reasonably rejected as it is in a strict logical contradiction with all other religions, as described above.
Do you have any actual demonstration for why anyone should accept God's authority? Or is everything else you have to offer as useless as crashfrog's claims?