Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 79 (8973 total)
187 online now:
vimesey (1 member, 186 visitors)
Newest Member: dad
Post Volume: Total: 875,605 Year: 7,353/23,288 Month: 1,259/1,214 Week: 271/303 Day: 0/68 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   the bluegenes Challenge (bluegenes and RAZD only)
AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 21 of 222 (574128)
08-14-2010 8:08 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by RAZD
08-12-2010 9:05 PM


Topic Please - Guildelines Please
RAZD,

Even in the Great Debate forum the guidelines are to be followed. While you accuse bluegenes of infractions (which I don't see) you yourself are not toeing the line. Please pull the log out of your own eye.

I've read the OP and the topic is not about bluegenes proving he has a scientific theory or that his theory is strong.

He has a theory and as I understand it, the challenge was to falsify it. You took that challenge.

Please refrain from repeating large portions of previous posts. Just link to the message.

Your verbosity is not moving the discussion forward.

Thanks
AdminPD


This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by RAZD, posted 08-12-2010 9:05 PM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by RAZD, posted 08-16-2010 6:52 PM AdminPD has responded

  
AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 23 of 222 (574651)
08-17-2010 6:54 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by RAZD
08-16-2010 6:52 PM


Re: Changing the topic?
quote:
I disagree that it is strong, and I disagree that it is a theory, so then it is up to him to substantiate that he has a theory, with evidence, and demonstrate that it is something more than wishful thinking - ie capable of producing actual results.
Then you wrote a bad OP if the only thing you're trying to do in this discussion is prove that his statement isn't a theory.

So now bluegenes knows that the only point of this great debate is whether his statement can be considered a theory or not. Not whether his statement or theory is true or false.

So keep to that topic and carry on.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by RAZD, posted 08-16-2010 6:52 PM RAZD has acknowledged this reply

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020