The meaning of "meaning"

Thats why its faulty. One can easily and lgically demonstrate the existence of God

Your excitability is premature because its preceeded by an assumed and possibly false presuposition. Arent you assuming they were failured attempts. Give me an example of one of these failed attempts in argument form and lest see if its a failure, before I rehash old stuff

I think anyone that knows me here knows I do not dodge answering questions, but so I dont rehash old stuff you think is failed, go ahead and present and example of a failed attempt since you ASSUME they are all failuresi dont think you understand the difference in failure and absolute proof. lets see

But I am trying to do that very thingThe meaning of meaning. Ill try it another way to see if you get the point I am striving for in an attempt to show you they are not contemptible, simply that you may not understand the proper way to proceed in establishing truths or factRules of evidence. Do you believe in evolution, do you believe it actually happened, Yes or No?Now watch. When and until you do demonstrate from your own perspective why you believe these "attempts" are contemptible then, you will demonstrate two things.1. That your method for deciding what is factual and believeable may be different than mine. You may have a whole set of rules that apply to others but not yourself2. Unless you can demonstrate why you should be able to firmly believe in something as a fact, without ever having seen it happen, you may need to revaluate whether these attempts are actually contimptible failuresSo, is evolution true and demonstratable as a fact?

I am more than willing to demonstrate the existence of God and meaning as soon as we see if we are on the same rule sheet for what is actually evidential and considered factual

Ill take this as an indirect somewhat evasive way of you indicating that it is possible to know something without having actually seen it happen. Thus we have now removed the so-called FAILURES up to distinct possibilities

Ah Im sure you want it to be irrelevant, but unless you can show me evolution first hand, you have no business proclaiming it a fact, THAT IS IF WE FOLLOW YOUR RULES

Again what concievable argument could be advanced to remove obvious and inticate design in the physical world, other than, I didnt see God make it and i dont like the argument