To demonstrate my point that you accept, believe and incur as fact, (evolution) and its entire process as fact, though having never seen what actually took place, I ONLY NEED TO REFER TO YOUR ABOVE STATEMENT, which is a small part of a gigantic process, all of which has not been so easlily demonstrated
As it stands, such will be, but if at a later date, conflicting data is shown to be more reliable than the current data, the idea, theory, etc. is changed.
thus:
Newton to Einstein, Gravity
Copernicus to Kepler, Heliocentrism
Mendeleev to Seaborg, Periodic Law
All of these accepted facts were altered based on data the originator did not have. That is the role of science.
The point which this topic is trying to show, meaning has no meaning except by what can be logically determined according to the data present and there is no meaning of anything except by evidence pointing to this data.
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008