I've always looked at the Big Bang theory as being incomplete at best.
It is generally accepted the theory means this:
One day there was a huge explosion in vacant space. And the pieces of this explosion dispursed through space with angular momentum.
They also cooled off and formed hard round balls of matter.
One of those balls of cooled off matter is the Earth.
Going back to the beginning of this theory, leaves one wondering where the Big Bomb came from.
Of course the currently held theory does not address the origin of the Big Bomb.
When any intelligent person discusses the origin of the Big Bomb, they immediately disprove the Big Bang.
Why?
Because, you are admitting there had to have been a time before Big Bang that a Big Bomb was formed slowly from highly reactive ingredients. Very flammable if you will.
So when I ask those staunch Big Bang supporters the simple question:
Where did the Big Bomb come from?
They disprove Big Bang if they attempt to answer it rationally.
If you yourself believe a Big Bomb was slowly formed through time with highly flammable ingredients, and then one day exploded in the event called Big Bang............You have just admitted Big Bang was NOT how the world BEGAN.
You have admitted that the slow forming of a Big Bomb did in fact occur before any Bang was noted. And any theory of creation must get to the root of the beginning, or it is not a theory of CREATION.....
Thank you, Nuimshaan
™ Version 4.2