Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8951 total)
752 online now:
Coragyps, DrJones*, dwise1, jar, PaulK, Thugpreacha (AdminPhat) (6 members, 746 visitors)
Newest Member: Mikee
Post Volume: Total: 866,860 Year: 21,896/19,786 Month: 459/1,834 Week: 459/315 Day: 55/82 Hour: 5/13


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   14C Calibration and Correlations
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 2526 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 5 of 59 (574106)
08-14-2010 1:38 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by archaeologist
08-14-2010 12:20 AM


then factoring in the truth that everything before Noah's flood wa sdestroyed, we do not know what records were kept or lost thus speculation sets in. oh, people may claim that there is no evidence for the flood but they cannot disprove it either. absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

The point is you are making the claim there was a flood, therefore it is up to you to show the evidence. The claimant has to show evidence not the denier. The denier can't show evidence since there is none.
What the denier does is show whether any evidence is reliable or not ie: falsification. I can't attempt to falsify evidence that does not exist.

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner.


There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008


This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by archaeologist, posted 08-14-2010 12:20 AM archaeologist has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019