Register | Sign In

Understanding through Discussion

EvC Forum active members: 60 (9107 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: sensei
Post Volume: Total: 907,649 Year: 4,530/14,231 Month: 1,245/2,209 Week: 84/325 Day: 55/29 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   14C Calibration and Correlations
Member (Idle past 3733 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Message 5 of 59 (574106)
08-14-2010 1:38 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by archaeologist
08-14-2010 12:20 AM

then factoring in the truth that everything before Noah's flood wa sdestroyed, we do not know what records were kept or lost thus speculation sets in. oh, people may claim that there is no evidence for the flood but they cannot disprove it either. absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
The point is you are making the claim there was a flood, therefore it is up to you to show the evidence. The claimant has to show evidence not the denier. The denier can't show evidence since there is none.
What the denier does is show whether any evidence is reliable or not ie: falsification. I can't attempt to falsify evidence that does not exist.
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic banner.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by archaeologist, posted 08-14-2010 12:20 AM archaeologist has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2023