people did not like it when i used conservipedia, butit was handy. i do not like it when people use wikipedia. that is one of the worst references anyone could use.
You truly are as uneducated as you act aren't you. Heck I bet you don't even have a Bob Jones degree.
Let me spell it out for you. Conservapedia just spout nonsense. They do not refer to original documents. If you knew anything about research you would see that caffeine referenced info from
The Oxford Companion to Archaeology that was in the wiki article.
There is even a footnote for this.
quote:
^ Fagan, Brian M., and Charlotte Beck, The Oxford Companion to Archeology, entry on the "Dead sea scrolls", Oxford University Press, 1996
Funny how you selective quoted from you source on the dead sea scrolls. Here is the complete sentence.
quote:
In sum, the general scholarly view today places the Qumran Scrolls roughly between 200BCE and 70CE, with a small portion of the texts possibly stretching back to the 3rd century BCE and the bulk of the extant material dating to the first century BCE, i.e. late Hasmonaean, early Herodian in the jargon of palaeographers.
Complete Dead Sea ScrollsI see you even changed the authors BCE and CE to BC and AD. How cute.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts