Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 84 (8915 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 07-15-2019 4:11 PM
35 online now:
dwise1, edge, ooh-child, PaulK, Thugpreacha (AdminPhat) (5 members, 30 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: 4petdinos
Upcoming Birthdays: lopezeast0211, Theodoric
Post Volume:
Total: 856,798 Year: 11,834/19,786 Month: 1,615/2,641 Week: 124/708 Day: 58/66 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Crop circles and intelligent design
PaulK
Member
Posts: 15201
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 3.4


Message 4 of 149 (180689)
01-26-2005 2:35 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Aximili23
01-25-2005 10:17 PM


While non-intellignet causes have been considered for the basic, circular "crop circles" it is true that most are considered the result of intelligent work.

However so far as I am aware science has NOT concluded that any unknown intelligence is involved. Even though there is no non-design explanation that is currently adequate to explain the more complex examples or any real hope of one.

So yes, I'd say that this is an interesting comparions - the ID movement IS very like the people who insist that crop circles are the work of extraterrestrials. And the ID'ers appear to come off worse in that comparison.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Aximili23, posted 01-25-2005 10:17 PM Aximili23 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Aximili23, posted 01-26-2005 3:29 AM PaulK has responded
 Message 8 by PecosGeorge, posted 01-26-2005 4:16 PM PaulK has not yet responded

    
PaulK
Member
Posts: 15201
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 3.4


Message 6 of 149 (180698)
01-26-2005 3:45 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Aximili23
01-26-2005 3:29 AM


Well lets clarify a few things. Human pranksters are a known intelligence - we know that they exist even if we can't name individuals responsible for a particular circle.

And I would certainy say that the more complex patterns are both more obviously the product of design than anything in biology - and the lack of a reasonable alternative is more solid than for anything in biology.

So in fact - especially if we include the possibility of human pranksters the inference of intelligent design has a stronger basis for crop circles than anything the ID movement has.

Now I don't think that there has been a lot of solid scientific investigation of crop circles. And that is the main reason why there has been no solid conclusion - it's just too likely to be human pranksters and that is of zero scientific interest (an unknown or poorly understood weather phenomenon on the other hand would be - so the more complex patterns are really LESS interesting to science).

In principle it is POSSIBLE some form of "ID" might become science - but the ID movement would need to seriously clean up its act and start doing a lot more work before there is any hope that they will contribute to it. It is NOT very likely that a scientific "ID" would bear much resemblance to what we see from the current movement.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Aximili23, posted 01-26-2005 3:29 AM Aximili23 has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019