Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 49 (9181 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: joebialek123
Post Volume: Total: 918,287 Year: 5,544/9,624 Month: 569/323 Week: 66/143 Day: 9/19 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Intelligent Design vs. Real Science
Son
Member (Idle past 3948 days)
Posts: 346
From: France,Paris
Joined: 03-11-2009


Message 24 of 142 (588972)
10-29-2010 11:42 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Buzsaw
10-29-2010 11:33 AM


Re: When ID Becomes Scientific
First: (not including Buzsaw but I didn't want to make 2 posts) Wayforward and those who responded to him are off-topic. The subject was about why ID that pretended to do science was so different from contested scientific theories in its approach.
And if I understood you well, Buzsaw, you're saying that I.D is in fact not science (as understood and practiced by the scientific community) so it's the reason it's unlike the contested scientific theories that arose through time? Does it mean you agree it shouldn't be taught in science classes? I'm asking because I was under the impression that Fiver adressed mostly Idists who wanted to put ID in science classes.
Edited by Son, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Buzsaw, posted 10-29-2010 11:33 AM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Buzsaw, posted 10-29-2010 8:49 PM Son has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024