First: (not including Buzsaw but I didn't want to make 2 posts) Wayforward and those who responded to him are off-topic. The subject was about why ID that pretended to do science was so different from contested scientific theories in its approach.
And if I understood you well, Buzsaw, you're saying that I.D is in fact not science (as understood and practiced by the scientific community) so it's the reason it's unlike the contested scientific theories that arose through time? Does it mean you agree it shouldn't be taught in science classes? I'm asking because I was under the impression that Fiver adressed mostly Idists who wanted to put ID in science classes.
Edited by Son, : No reason given.
™ Version 4.2
