Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 80 (8908 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 05-27-2019 6:16 AM
22 online now:
caffeine, RAZD, Tangle (3 members, 19 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WeloTemo
Post Volume:
Total: 852,107 Year: 7,143/19,786 Month: 1,684/1,581 Week: 63/443 Day: 3/60 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   secularists do not want the truth
jar
Member
Posts: 30944
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 4.6


Message 2 of 85 (575644)
08-20-2010 5:01 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by archaeologist
08-20-2010 4:58 PM


the evidence is there that proves the Bible true, it is up to you to make your choice to accept or rejectit but you cannot keep demanding more for it will not come.

Where is the evidence?


Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by archaeologist, posted 08-20-2010 4:58 PM archaeologist has not yet responded

  
jar
Member
Posts: 30944
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 4.6


Message 8 of 85 (575672)
08-20-2010 7:12 PM


The report that archaeologist used as his link is yet another very great example of why science works and creationism is just a bad joke. It looks at ten different, separate and independent studies, each looking at different factors and based on different assumption, yet all end up independently confirming a date around 200,000 years ago.

The truth is that science works and pretending the Bible is historical or science doesn't.

AbE:

Another thing that is important about the study archaeologist provided is that it again refutes the factuality of Genesis 2&3 that we are descended from the mate of the Mt Eve. The most recent common male ancestor was not concurrent with the most recent common female ancestor.

Edited by jar, : add genesis info.


Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
  
jar
Member
Posts: 30944
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004
Member Rating: 4.6


Message 74 of 85 (577358)
08-28-2010 10:43 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by slevesque
08-28-2010 12:52 AM


When you can provide evidence refuting the mountains of evidence for recent special creation, then you can propose this as begging the question.

Of course I can. Please provide an observation of special creation for me to refute.

There is no evidence for special creation, ether ancient or recent, and that is the problem you face.


Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by slevesque, posted 08-28-2010 12:52 AM slevesque has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019