mignat, welcome to E v C!
I can't speak for Dirk, but to me the question is interesting to see what kind of mental gymnastics one will be willing to engage in to justify an obviously impossible story, and one that contradicts volumes of evidence in multiple scientific disciplines.
It's an example of the kind of thing that Dr. Adequate was talking about in the quote of his that I include in my signature:
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened.
Emphasis in original
You are quite right, of course, about one thing. If the flood was orchestrated by a supreme being who is capable of overcoming known laws of the universe and leaving no evidence behind, then anything is possible and the story is consistent with any and all evidence. If the religious left their response at that, most of us would have very little to say to them. Instead, they insist on trying to make the story consistent with physical evidence on earth. This they cannot do without doing great violence to the evidence, the scientific method, rational thought or all three.
I hope you enjoy your time here, however long you choose to stay
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
™ Version 4.2