Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,845 Year: 4,102/9,624 Month: 973/974 Week: 300/286 Day: 21/40 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Which animals would populate the earth if the ark was real?
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8558
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 4.9


(3)
Message 751 of 991 (708379)
10-09-2013 8:04 AM
Reply to: Message 750 by mindspawn
10-09-2013 4:49 AM


God Didn't Know?
They did not have a word for planet earth back then because thy did not know the earth was a planet.
Wait, wait. Are you saying that this god thing, whose words are supposedly quoted verbatim into the scriptures, did not know Earth was a planet when it used the hebrew word?
or
Are you now admitting that this whole global flud myth was actually just a local phenomenon greatly embellished by generations of re-telling before it was finally written down?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 750 by mindspawn, posted 10-09-2013 4:49 AM mindspawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 764 by mindspawn, posted 10-10-2013 3:35 AM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8558
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 4.9


(2)
Message 785 of 991 (708538)
10-10-2013 9:05 PM
Reply to: Message 769 by mindspawn
10-10-2013 4:58 AM


Re: Geology is irrelevant; try addressing the topic.
I believe through errors in carbon dating calibration and evolutionary assumptions concerning how evolution needs time, the mainstream dating is out by exponential factors.
And this belief is based upon your heartfelt desire that, somehow, some way, any way, your personal interpretation of the bible be correct.
You couldn't possibly know.
You have no idea how carbon dating or potassium-argon dating or argon-argon dating are nor how they work, nor how we know they are accurate in what they tell us about deep time. You just assume they have to be wrong since they destroy your biblical fantasy.
You also assume that deep time measures have to be rigged to correspond with time estimates for evolution to work when, in fact, if you bothered to look at the history, you would know that deep time was already known before evolution hit the scene. It was deep time that gave evolution impetus not the other way around.
Why do creationists insist on being so wrong about so much?
Don't answer that. It was rhetorical. We already know why.
Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 769 by mindspawn, posted 10-10-2013 4:58 AM mindspawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 794 by mindspawn, posted 10-11-2013 8:10 AM AZPaul3 has replied

  
AZPaul3
Member
Posts: 8558
From: Phoenix
Joined: 11-06-2006
Member Rating: 4.9


(1)
Message 800 of 991 (708596)
10-11-2013 10:04 AM
Reply to: Message 794 by mindspawn
10-11-2013 8:10 AM


Re: Geology is irrelevant; try addressing the topic.
I am nearly ready for the dates forum ...
So all this time you have insisted you were right when you knew you were completely ignorant of one of the major mechanisms involved choosing instead to call the experts in the field incompetent, foolish and liars all without cause.
This kind of intellectual dishonesty is not acceptable. Unfortunately it is also expected of creationists.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 794 by mindspawn, posted 10-11-2013 8:10 AM mindspawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 813 by mindspawn, posted 10-14-2013 5:38 AM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024