Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,865 Year: 4,122/9,624 Month: 993/974 Week: 320/286 Day: 41/40 Hour: 7/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is religion good for us?
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 1 of 181 (576380)
08-23-2010 10:23 PM


Without question, organized religion is an immense and awesome presence in the world today. From a quiet reassuring and cohesive force that literally billions of people feel in their everyday lives to a loud and divisive force that is at the root of conflicts around the world.
Simply put; Is organized religion in the world today a greater force for good or evil? (there may be problems with good/evil perhaps someone can suggest better words)
It is my assertion that organized religion is doing more harm to man than good. I may concede that it has been beneficial in the past and may even have been pivotal in our assent from darkness but in the world today, it is a cancerous blight.
I offer these examples,
-the Israel/Palestine conflict
-the sunni/shia conflict
-India/Pakistan conflict
-stem cell research in the USA
-the Texas board of education
-drug war/policy (this may be strictly economics hiding behind morals)
-quality of life for women in places like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan
-quality of life for anyone in places like Saudia Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan
-caste system in India
-seperate school board funding
-religion based terrorism
-the fact that I have to swear on the bible in a court room (whole truth my ass)
-Jehovas witnesses (granted they do provide entertainment value)
-religion based censorship/miseducation around the world (is that a word?)
All this against what? A warm and fuzzy feeling for the intellectually lazy?

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Larni, posted 08-24-2010 11:29 AM Dogmafood has replied
 Message 6 by ringo, posted 08-24-2010 11:50 AM Dogmafood has replied
 Message 7 by caffeine, posted 08-24-2010 11:56 AM Dogmafood has replied
 Message 8 by Jumped Up Chimpanzee, posted 08-24-2010 12:08 PM Dogmafood has seen this message but not replied
 Message 9 by Rahvin, posted 08-24-2010 12:40 PM Dogmafood has replied
 Message 12 by Stile, posted 08-24-2010 3:03 PM Dogmafood has replied
 Message 40 by archaeologist, posted 08-25-2010 5:38 AM Dogmafood has replied
 Message 58 by nwr, posted 08-25-2010 10:44 PM Dogmafood has seen this message but not replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 16 of 181 (576590)
08-24-2010 5:43 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Dr Jack
08-24-2010 11:28 AM


I see the "crutch for the weak" and "intellectually lazy" canards have been dropped all ready.
I will retract that. It serves no good purpose. It is an expression of anger.
But faith is irrational. If one chooses this path for themselves that is up to them. The problem for me comes when it seeps out into their relations with others.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Dr Jack, posted 08-24-2010 11:28 AM Dr Jack has not replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 17 of 181 (576591)
08-24-2010 5:43 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Larni
08-24-2010 11:29 AM


Here's the thing: that warm fuzzy feeling is actually good for people to have. It is good way to stave off several debilitating psychological problems from stress, to depression, to reaction adjustment.
Personal faith is valuable and its benefits can be seen. I was careful to single out organized religion as opposed to personal faith. Are they inseparable?
I see religion as a problem when it rejects every other religion and cannot live in harmony with the out groups.
I agree.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Larni, posted 08-24-2010 11:29 AM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by Larni, posted 08-25-2010 7:48 AM Dogmafood has seen this message but not replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 18 of 181 (576592)
08-24-2010 5:44 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by ringo
08-24-2010 11:50 AM


Does a life saved in a charity hospital cancel out a life lost in a religious war?
No it doesnt. Just because I save you from being hit by a bus doesnt mean I can throw the next guy under it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by ringo, posted 08-24-2010 11:50 AM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by ringo, posted 08-24-2010 6:00 PM Dogmafood has replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 19 of 181 (576593)
08-24-2010 5:44 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by caffeine
08-24-2010 11:56 AM


The problem with your list, is that it's not at all clear that any of them are examples of organised religion causing a problem. Let's have a look
quote:
-the Israel/Palestine conflict
-the sunni/shia conflict
-India/Pakistan conflict
The key thing here is just the notion of different identities. Yes, in these cases those identities are tied to religions, but this is in no sense essential to create these conflicts
I am not saying religion is the only cause but if we could magically remove religion from these conflicts what would be the basis for the conflict. Israel/Palestine is convoluted no doubt. The problem may be that we look for differences instead of similarities.
Even though opposition to scientific research such as this often comes from religious groups, Luddism also crops up outside organised religion. Consider the attitude of many green groups to things like GM-food. They stem from the same revulsion of man meddling in things he should not wot of, but these arguments can come without any religious terms from people who wouldn't consider themselves religious.
And this is the point I'm trying to make, I think. Your beef isn't with organised religion at all. It's with human irrationality and illiberal ideologies which are present all over the place, with and without organised religion. You're mistaking causes, I think.
I agree. Notwithstanding, religion is a major contributor to the suppression of knowledge.
but I don't see any religion in the drug war
You may be right. Most of the people I hear defending the war on drugs have a sense of moral superiority. I suspect that it is mostly based on economics. Nobody wants everyone to stop taking drugs. They just want you to take their drugs. So I will concede that the drug war/policy is not religiously based. I will maintain that without a religious input it would be a different thing altogether.
You're mistaking causes, I think.
What would you put on the list?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by caffeine, posted 08-24-2010 11:56 AM caffeine has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by caffeine, posted 08-25-2010 6:37 AM Dogmafood has seen this message but not replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 20 of 181 (576594)
08-24-2010 5:44 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Rahvin
08-24-2010 12:40 PM


The major negative of religion is actually not on your list at all - in fact your list consists only of symptoms of the on real problem: religion does not significantly change, because it is not at its core a rational approach to determinign the real state of the Universe.
That is well said and I agree. That is religions greatest problem. The fact that it is so slow to adapt. But are symptoms not evidence of the affliction? Part of my reason for the OP was to identify the benefits of organized religion. As Stile said, take the good and leave the bad.
I also wanted to discriminate between religions effect in the past and the present. What do we see now and what should we do about it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Rahvin, posted 08-24-2010 12:40 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 21 of 181 (576595)
08-24-2010 5:45 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Stile
08-24-2010 3:03 PM


Re: Part of the Problem
But let's be clear that "getting rid of religion" is not a solution to the problem. In fact, it's a very large part of the very large problem that created the mess in the first place.
You made a bunch of good points and I agree with you.
I am not suggesting that we be rid of religion. That is most likely an impossibility. I am suggesting that by identifying the places where it does harm we can work towards mitigating that harm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Stile, posted 08-24-2010 3:03 PM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 22 of 181 (576596)
08-24-2010 5:45 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Coyote
08-24-2010 3:14 PM


Re: Part of the Problem
How about getting rid of religious fundamentalism, in all forms?
That seems to be where the real problem lies.
It shows up most there but the cancer is much deeper. I agree with the idea that the greatest problem with religion is that it is not a viable means of knowing the world. All the myriad problems stem from this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Coyote, posted 08-24-2010 3:14 PM Coyote has not replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 23 of 181 (576597)
08-24-2010 5:45 PM


So can we populate the list? What belongs on it? What should be removed? What goes on the list for the positive effects of religion? Is it still my list against the warm fuzzy feeling?

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Rahvin, posted 08-24-2010 6:33 PM Dogmafood has replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 24 of 181 (576598)
08-24-2010 5:47 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by ringo
08-24-2010 5:35 PM


Re: Part of the Problem
The phrase "getting rid of" has some scary connotations.
Yes it does but surely there is a point where tolerance reaches an end.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by ringo, posted 08-24-2010 5:35 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by ringo, posted 08-24-2010 6:06 PM Dogmafood has replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 27 of 181 (576606)
08-24-2010 6:10 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by ringo
08-24-2010 6:00 PM


So how do you measure good vs. evil if not by body count?
I see what you mean. If I am a policeman who has done a lifetime of good deeds and then I murder someone. My lifetime of good deeds may help reduce the sentence but I am still guilty of murder. If I am a serial killer who saves someones life I still deserve prison. I would say that it takes alot of good to equal a little bad. At least that is what a court would say.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by ringo, posted 08-24-2010 6:00 PM ringo has seen this message but not replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 31 of 181 (576613)
08-24-2010 6:49 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by ringo
08-24-2010 6:06 PM


Re: Part of the Problem
At that point, does the end justify the means?
This comes back to my original question: How do you measure good vs. evil? How evil can you be in "getting rid of" another evil? It seems to me that getting rid of things (people) is the problem, not the solution.
I dont think anyone is talking about getting rid of people. At least I am not. I am talking about identifying a bad thing and pushing back.
Tolerance is a good thing and works like grease. There is a point where no amount of lubrication will suffice. Are you suggesting that it is evil for me to push back against something that I perceive as evil. Again I do not know that good/evil are the right terms but I am not sure what else to use.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by ringo, posted 08-24-2010 6:06 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by ringo, posted 08-24-2010 7:09 PM Dogmafood has replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


(1)
Message 32 of 181 (576614)
08-24-2010 6:55 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by ringo
08-24-2010 6:06 PM


Re: Part of the Problem
How do you measure good vs. evil?
By having conversations like this one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by ringo, posted 08-24-2010 6:06 PM ringo has seen this message but not replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 34 of 181 (576616)
08-24-2010 7:11 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Rahvin
08-24-2010 6:33 PM


But I feel very uncomfortable labeling all religion as "evil" and thus lumping theocratic mass-murdering terrorists in with some Wiccan lady from New York who does little more than pray privately over some multicolored candles. Neither may be optimal, both may be irrational, but one is most certainly evil while the other is much closer to harmless.
I am not labelling all religion as evil. That is the point of the thread. What parts are bad and which are good. It may be a reality that most people get their ethical instruction from a religious basis but it is certainly not the only base. Ethical and moral behaviour is quickly evident to the children in the playground.
I see the challenge as one of separating the good aspects that religion has claimed as its own from all the control stuff. It seems to me that our instinctive sense of right and wrong has been hijacked.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Rahvin, posted 08-24-2010 6:33 PM Rahvin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Rahvin, posted 08-24-2010 8:05 PM Dogmafood has replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


Message 35 of 181 (576617)
08-24-2010 7:26 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by ringo
08-24-2010 7:09 PM


Re: Part of the Problem
That's when it starts getting gray.
Indeed it is all gray and there are precious few absolutes. But there are nuclei.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by ringo, posted 08-24-2010 7:09 PM ringo has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024