Likewise, as archaeologist pointed out, it was not the great scientific community that uncovered his fraud, it was the students!
The article linked in the OP made it sound as if the students where lab students involved in the study. "
students felt they were being pushed to reach a particular conclusion that they thought was incorrect" If this is the case then it seems quite obvious that the very people directly involved in the study would be the first people to discover a fraud. I think it would be great news if the very first people that could have possibly exposed a fraud did in fact expose the fraud.
How in the world can anyone try to use this as evidence of the great moral code of science?
Because not even the people he used to help with the study could be trusted to cover up a fraud? Not even lowly students would shut up, let alone competitors.