how about Caucasians, Africans or Asians? They all have very distinct physical similarities which are not shared with other races. would that be safe to say that they have a genetic make-up unique to their race?
No, the classical racial traits occur in clines, that is, these traits have a range of variation. One example is skin color, which ranges from dark to light skin. Within each group you care to define there is a range of variation.
You can get significant differences by comparing groups at great distances from one another, or groups from vastly differing climates.
Likewise, you can see similarities by comparing groups in similar climates. Negritos in SE Asia share a number of traits with African pygmies (dark skin, short stature and hair form, for example), but the two groups are only very distantly related.
In addition to the classical racial traits (skin color, hair and nasal form, stature and body form, etc.) you also have genetic traits. These include a wide range of things from blood types to fingerprint patterns to ear wax type. These were not used in classical racial schemes because early explorers couldn't examine those traits--they just used those they could see.
And many of the classical traits relate more to climate than they do to descent.
Bottom line is race is a human construct applied by different people for different reasons and using different criteria.
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.