Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Herbal supplements in US commonly have traces of contaminants
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 76 of 102 (579441)
09-04-2010 4:53 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by bluescat48
09-04-2010 1:28 AM


Re: One man's herb
bluescat48 writes:
So I could not take your herbal substance. Your manufacturer is obviously doing the correct thing without regulation, but that does not mean that all do. What if I were to buy it from a manufacturer who is not so ethical and puts no cardio/vascular warning. Using it could kill me, and is most likely the cause of a number of drug related deaths. If all manufacturers placed warnings of interaction on their products, there would be no need for regulations, only some don't.
Nearly all companies are aware of the liability risk in any given business and they know what labeling info is necessary to protect themselves relative to warnings and info. It is in their best interest to label warnings.
There is a far greater health and life risk in food diet, especially fat foods, junk foods candies, icecream pop, etc than in the herbals, yet nobody is clamoring for additional regulation of the food industry.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by bluescat48, posted 09-04-2010 1:28 AM bluescat48 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by Jon, posted 09-04-2010 7:08 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 77 of 102 (579460)
09-04-2010 7:08 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by Buzsaw
09-04-2010 4:53 PM


Re: One man's herb
There is a far greater health and life risk in food diet, especially fat foods, junk foods candies, icecream pop, etc than in the herbals, yet nobody is clamoring for additional regulation of the food industry.
I believe all of these things should be regulated, very heavily. Much junk food should be sold in the poison aisle, and 'herbals' in the gardening section. It really comes down to an issue of mislabeling... everything's mislabeled and sold as something it's not, always intentionally so.

"Can we say the chair on the cat, for example? Or the basket in the person? No, we can't..." - Harriet J. Ottenheimer

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Buzsaw, posted 09-04-2010 4:53 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by Buzsaw, posted 09-04-2010 10:43 PM Jon has replied

  
Dogmafood
Member (Idle past 376 days)
Posts: 1815
From: Ontario Canada
Joined: 08-04-2010


(2)
Message 78 of 102 (579467)
09-04-2010 7:56 PM


"I have a sore throat."
2000 BC : "Eat this root"
1200 AD : "That root is heathen, say this prayer."
1500 AD : "That prayer is superstition, drink this elixir."
1800 AD : "That elixir is snake oil, Take this pill."
1950 AD : "That pill is ineffective, Take this antibiotic."
2000 AD : "That antibiotic is artificial, here why dont you eat this root."
AbE; Author unknown. I found this on a site of compiled science humour. The original author was not listed and now I cant find the site again. My apologies. Someone should downgrade the message rating.
Edited by Dogmafood, : grovelling submission to the regulations

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by Theodoric, posted 09-04-2010 10:51 PM Dogmafood has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 79 of 102 (579501)
09-04-2010 10:43 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by Jon
09-04-2010 7:08 PM


Re: One man's herb
Jon writes:
I believe all of these things should be regulated, very heavily.
Where does regulation end and freedom begin, in your thinking? How about if guvm't comes on into your garage, basement, yard, kitchen, living room and bedroom and regulate you into total safety?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Jon, posted 09-04-2010 7:08 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by jar, posted 09-04-2010 10:48 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 95 by Jon, posted 09-05-2010 3:47 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 80 of 102 (579503)
09-04-2010 10:48 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by Buzsaw
09-04-2010 10:43 PM


Re: One man's herb
Good thing it is just the Republicans and Tea Party crowd that seem to want to regulate what happens in the bedroom.
Of course as usual, that has NOTHING to do with the topic.
By the way, there is a thread where you can bring any evidence you think might support the Biblical Exodus myth.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Buzsaw, posted 09-04-2010 10:43 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9197
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 81 of 102 (579504)
09-04-2010 10:51 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by Dogmafood
09-04-2010 7:56 PM


Your post adds nothing to the conversation, is not based upon any evidence or fact and does not even qualify as an anecdote. What is the reason and meaning for the waste of a post?
Were you trying to impart some sort of universal wisdom? There are many causes for sore throats. Some need medication, most need rest. A doctor could tell you which. An herbal may or may not be effective. If it is a strep throat a round of antibiotics may be what is needed.
So please what was the point your were attempting make?
ABE
Since you posted this in quotation marks, is there a source for this?
Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by Dogmafood, posted 09-04-2010 7:56 PM Dogmafood has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by onifre, posted 09-04-2010 11:45 PM Theodoric has not replied
 Message 92 by Dogmafood, posted 09-05-2010 9:35 AM Theodoric has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 82 of 102 (579515)
09-04-2010 11:03 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by Omnivorous
09-04-2010 5:13 AM


Re: One man's herb
Omnivorous writes:
If your herbals have any effect, good or bad, it's because they contain chemicals: chemicals active in the human body are called drugs.
Nonsense! Most of our herbals have no chemicals in them. Many foods and drinks contain chemicals. What's the difference. They, like most nutritional herbals are not considered drugs.
Online Dictionary definition of chemical:
1. Of or relating to chemistry.
2. Of or relating to the properties or actions of chemicals.
n.
1. A substance with a distinct molecular composition that is produced by or used in a chemical process.
2. A drug, especially an illicit or addictive one.
Many foods and drinks have chemicals in them.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Omnivorous, posted 09-04-2010 5:13 AM Omnivorous has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by jar, posted 09-04-2010 11:19 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 84 by bluescat48, posted 09-04-2010 11:21 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 86 by crashfrog, posted 09-04-2010 11:58 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 83 of 102 (579522)
09-04-2010 11:19 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by Buzsaw
09-04-2010 11:03 PM


Re: One man's herb
Buz writes:
Nonsense! Most of our herbals have no chemicals in them.
Sorry Buz but that is not just false, it is absurdly false even when considering Homeopathy. Of course with Homeopathy it would be true to say that it contains none of the chemicals they claim are in it.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Buzsaw, posted 09-04-2010 11:03 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4217 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 84 of 102 (579524)
09-04-2010 11:21 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by Buzsaw
09-04-2010 11:03 PM


Re: One man's herb
Nonsense! Most of our herbals have no chemicals in them.
Then what are they? They are composed of chemicals as are all foods, vitamins, minerals, proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, digestive enzymes, salt, sugar, the entire human body etc.
All are composed of chemical elements as is the air we breathe, the water we drink, the clothes we wear and this keyboard I am typing on.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Buzsaw, posted 09-04-2010 11:03 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2978 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 85 of 102 (579529)
09-04-2010 11:45 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by Theodoric
09-04-2010 10:51 PM


So please what was the point your were attempting make?
I'm gonna go with funny, which I don't know about you, but I found it funny. A cynical outlook on todays full circle back to pre-medicine times. A journey in sarcasm if you will, where once one thought that an herb would cure, a couple thousand years of advanced medicine later, and some have gone back to those pre-medicine days of herbs curing, instead of antibiotics.
Since you posted this in quotation marks, is there a source for this?
Yeah, I'd like to know too. So I can steal the premise.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Theodoric, posted 09-04-2010 10:51 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1494 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 86 of 102 (579534)
09-04-2010 11:58 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by Buzsaw
09-04-2010 11:03 PM


Re: One man's herb
Most of our herbals have no chemicals in them.
Maybe you could be a little more specific about what you mean by "chemical"? If your herbals have any effect at all it's because of the chemicals they contain - the natural chemicals produced by that specific plant, presumably.
They, like most nutritional herbals are not considered drugs.
Not because of any physical constituents they have, or lack, but because of an anti-regulatory game played by the altie-medicine industry - they lobbied to have them falsely considered "food supplements" to escape onerous regulations, even though you've made it abundantly clear that people take them for primarily medical, not nutritional reasons.
But if they weren't drugs, they wouldn't do anything, by definition.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Buzsaw, posted 09-04-2010 11:03 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1494 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 87 of 102 (579535)
09-04-2010 11:59 PM


Also
Also, Buz, why don't you take aspirin? Aspirin is from willow's bark. Does it not count as a herbal unless it's literally from an herb?

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 88 of 102 (579614)
09-05-2010 8:38 AM
Reply to: Message 68 by Dogmafood
09-04-2010 8:44 AM


Re: Why the "Free Market" can't deliver health care
Regulations require the tests. Regulations should also require the companies wishing to profit from the sale of these items to demonstrate that these products are safe and effective for whatever the company is claiming on the label before they are allowed on the market.
Are you suggesting that we go back to snake-oil days, when any shyster with a lot of enthusiastic selling techniques can put whatever they want in a bottle and sell it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Dogmafood, posted 09-04-2010 8:44 AM Dogmafood has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by Dogmafood, posted 09-05-2010 11:03 AM nator has replied

  
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2462
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 89 of 102 (579617)
09-05-2010 8:59 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by Hyroglyphx
09-03-2010 5:31 PM


Re: Wipe your own ass
Hi Hyro, sorry for the belated reply;
I'm saying that pharmaceuticals and the FDA should not be anyone's assurance.
That is their explicit purpose, to assure us that drugs have been tested and found to be both effective and safe. As I have demonstrated, you have no way of determining these things on your own, so you must rely on others to do it for you.
I could point to 101 cases of people dying or being irreparably harmed by pharmaceuticals. That's WITH the FDA's approval...
That few? That's kinda small beer. You know full well that you're only getting those numbers because there are literally billions of people taking medicines. The market for herbals is much smaller.
I'm not saying the FDA is functionless, I'm saying that take everything they say with a grain of salt.
I agree. The FDA is not perfect. Drug company regulation worldwide is not perfect. That's no reason to scrap it all, it's a reason to improve upon the current system. This is doubly true if we're talking about setting up a new and similar system for herbals. Such a system could embrace the best aspects of the FDA and try to avoid its flaws.
I do think that the pharma industry could do with a shake up though. Forcing them to publish all their trial data would be a good start, stopping them from cherry-picking what they make public.
These are the same kind of people that disseminated the same propaganda that marijuana caused "reefer madness," making negro's and chinamen go crazy and have homicidal ideations.
Nothing but mud-slinging. The two eras are not comparable. When did the "Refer Madness" crowd perform extensive clinical trials? Or publish their data? Never. There is no comparison.
Mutate and Survive

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-03-2010 5:31 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 90 of 102 (579620)
09-05-2010 9:03 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by Buzsaw
09-04-2010 4:26 PM


Re: One man's herb
The primary usage of herbals is preventative food suppliments.
Well no, that's not true in my experience. I worked in a large co-op grocery store that sold tons and tons of herbal tea that was not advertized as food, but as medicine. One brand is even called "Traditional Medicinals". People came in all the time with specific ailments they were hoping to help with these teas, which they didn't drink at other times.
These food suppliments include such herbs as beets, garlic, wheat grass, cilantro, parsely, flax, rose hips, celery, hot pepper, various berries, including rasberry, cherry, etc.
No buz, those aren't actually supplements. Those are just regular foods, because they have nutritive value.
What the FDA defines as "nutritional supplements" are things like St. John's Wort, echinacia, ginko-biloba, ginseng, kava, etc. Things that have no nutritive value.
St. John's Wort is something that people take for depression. They take it as an antidepressant. In other words, they use it as a medication to treat their depression. Right?
It is irrevelant as to whether they are tasty.
It is relevant if you are claiming that these things are food, though. They aren't culinary herbs, buz. They have no nutritional value. They are thought to have medicinal effects only.
What is revelant to this topic is their safety, so far as causing serious enough threat to life and health.
Yes, but their effectiveness is also relevant to the topic, as well. Should a company be able to sell an herb as something that has a beneficial effect on high blood pressure if that company cannot demonstrate that the product actually does have the effect they are claiming?
Hawthorne is widely known as beneficial to the heart organ
How is this known?
Follow the money
Indeed, buz, follow the money. The herbal supplement industry is a multi-billion dollar a year big, big business that is mostly owned by Big Pharma! Most of the supplements for sale in the US are grown and manufactured in China, because its cheaper and the regulators for organics and whatnot are less bothersome.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Buzsaw, posted 09-04-2010 4:26 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024