Buzsaw writes:
I don't see why all of the tado over the images. I don't dig that anything has been altered just because the little man was carved out. A different person may have came in from the camp and added the man. Who knows?
Why should we
assume he was? Because it fits your story so nicely? If
you want to claim he was added later, then
you will have to provide evidence for it. He could also be part of the original picture. Also, it's not just about the little man, it's about all the other images as well. In fact, Wyatt puts great importance on the little man, saying that he is evidence they worshipped a golden calf there, your assertion that the man was added later
harms his case. Thank you.
This is a big fuss about little of consequence. My point was only that animals were in the camp and there was a golden calf worshiped.
And you have provided no evidence for either assertion. I'll grant you that they had animals with them, this doesn't sound so implausible, but these images are not evidence that they worshipped any golden calf. Also, the fact that they had animals with them would also leave lots of evidence along their trail. Evidence that just isn't there.
So far as I'm aware, the scripture doesn't give any details about just how the worship was done.
So? It at least speaks about an altar.
If any alter was involved Moses would have destroyed it. The images plus the fact that the mountain is guarded says something about there being some significant activity there at some point in time.
Perhaps it is guarded to protect the images, if it is even guarded at all. The again
something significant doesn't mean anything at all, now does it? It could be a place where cow herders worshipped their gods, and the images are some sort of prayer to receive plenty of cows. You don't know
what the significance was, even if it was significant at all.
Imo, you're not helping your weak arguments at all nor are you diminishing my points.
You have no points. All you have are assertions
I've said about all I have that will satisfy Admin or any of you people.
Well, it won't satisfy us, because it is not evidence.
You all had your minds set at the OP message. You all will go on from here and repeat your lies to the www unceasingly that Buzsaw has never ever cited one iota of evidence for the Biblical Exodus.
It's not a lie. We showed you how your "evidence" was worthless. You just kept repeating it anyway. All you ever did was assert.
™ Version 4.2
