nwr writes:
Hyroglyphics writes:
Hyro writes:
First Cause arguments seem pointless because it's an infinite loop of semantics and where no evidence from either side can be given.
I completely agree.
This kind of argument is no more convincing when it comes from Hawking than when it comes from a religious apologist
If all would simply cite 1LoT and Biblical creationists would cite the Biblical record along with 1LoT, all could go, figure and assume that the Universe has eternally existed, that being compatible with observed LoT and that Jehovah, creator, has existed in the cosmos eternally according to the Biblical record.
If there was a
first cause there is no valid theory or hypothetical premise until there is an explanation for it. Void of an explanable first clause, the universe should be assumed by both
camps to be eternal.
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.
™ Version 4.2
(1)
