Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Archaeologist's evidence for creation
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3941
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 8 of 8 (579928)
09-06-2010 4:54 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Admin
09-06-2010 10:47 AM


Archaeologist's "Creation as Science" topic
The Archaeologist only messages
Archaeologist, at message 7 of the above cited, writes:
***note: i had asked that this be placed in a non-scientific forum so I could participate but I see that request was denied. so since i have to defend my point of view, it looks like i will have to once again appear in this section. BUT be advised, do not expect me to present evidence the secular scientific way.***
I've read through Archaeologist's messages and his evidence for creation seems to consist of:
  • The things of evolution (and other sciences) can't work (implying the validity of creationism as a default).
  • The Bible says creation happened, therefore it did happen.
If anyone finds more than that, please point it out.
Now, contrary to many/most of the evolution side, I think the creation default would carry some weight IF a scientific alternative could not be found and supported.
Perhaps this topic should be closed, with any discussion being diverted to the above cited topic.
Archaeologist has his own site, which includes a discussion forum. Members might want to take a stab at that forum (same type brick wall, different location).
Moose

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Admin, posted 09-06-2010 10:47 AM Admin has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024