Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 84 (8943 total)
32 online now:
DrJones*, jar, Percy (Admin), Tanypteryx, vimesey (5 members, 27 visitors)
Newest Member: LaLa dawn
Upcoming Birthdays: DrJones*
Post Volume: Total: 864,046 Year: 19,082/19,786 Month: 1,502/1,705 Week: 308/446 Day: 47/59 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0
Percy
Member
Posts: 18879
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 6 of 683 (580895)
09-12-2010 8:40 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Nij
09-12-2010 8:19 AM


Re: ICR Sues Texas
To the moderators,

I endorse everything Nij says. I would have posted the exact same things, but it takes time to carefully compose such condensations.

Unfortunately Adminnemooseus and I are the only active moderators in the science threads right now, and since I'm one of the primary participants I cannot moderate in that thread. Adminnemooseus closed the thread at one point for being off topic, but I reopened it in my role as Admin because as a participant I knew that it was off topic in appearance only.

I think the thread is still on topic. It is trying to discuss whether ICR is teaching science or religious apologetics, but it looks like the thread is off-topic because we've digressed into trying to figure out what Dawn Bertot is saying. I think if Dawn can be encouraged to clarify what he is trying to say that the thread can then return to discussing whether what he's talking about is science, and if it is, whether that is what ICR is teaching. But it all depends upon whether Adminnemooseus is willing to try moderating the thread.

--Percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Nij, posted 09-12-2010 8:19 AM Nij has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Nij, posted 09-12-2010 6:34 PM Percy has acknowledged this reply
 Message 8 by Adminnemooseus, posted 09-13-2010 2:22 AM Percy has acknowledged this reply

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 18879
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 11 of 683 (581795)
09-17-2010 3:03 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by AdminPD
09-17-2010 11:35 AM


Re: genesis 1 vs 2 biblical inerrancy thread
Hi PD,

I admit I was confused about the distinction, too, so maybe if I give my understanding of it now it will help clarify.

The originator of the Genesis 1 vs. Genesis 2 thread points to what look like contradictions between Genesis 1 and 2 and asks participants to assume, for the sake of discussion, that the contradictions are real. He then asks for a discussion about whether the contradictions call the inerrancy of the Bible into question.

Is that pretty close?

--Percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by AdminPD, posted 09-17-2010 11:35 AM AdminPD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by AdminPD, posted 09-17-2010 4:18 PM Percy has acknowledged this reply
 Message 13 by Omnivorous, posted 09-17-2010 4:49 PM Percy has responded

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 18879
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 14 of 683 (581818)
09-17-2010 5:14 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Omnivorous
09-17-2010 4:49 PM


Re: genesis 1 vs 2 biblical inerrancy thread
I was only trying to make sure of what PD was saying. I wasn't agreeing and or disagreeing with her interpretation of what the thread is about.

When oh when will I ever learn to mind my own business when it comes to the religious threads!!

--Percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Omnivorous, posted 09-17-2010 4:49 PM Omnivorous has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Omnivorous, posted 09-17-2010 5:24 PM Percy has acknowledged this reply

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 18879
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.5


(1)
Message 282 of 683 (618587)
06-04-2011 5:27 AM


The Has the bias made this forum essentially irrelevant? thread is no longer discussing the topic and should be considered for closure.

--Percy


  
Percy
Member
Posts: 18879
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 287 of 683 (620121)
06-14-2011 8:47 AM


Thread Off Topic
I think the My HUGE problem with creationist thinking. thread has gone off topic, I posted a note about it at Message 114.

--Percy


Replies to this message:
 Message 288 by Adminnemooseus, posted 06-14-2011 9:09 PM Percy has acknowledged this reply

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 18879
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 291 of 683 (621595)
06-27-2011 8:23 AM


Forum Guideline Reminder Needed
Dr Adequate over at the Why are there no human apes alive today? thread in Message 396:

Dr Adequate writes:

And yet you (you hypocrite)...

--Percy


  
Percy
Member
Posts: 18879
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 296 of 683 (622251)
07-01-2011 8:38 PM


Moderator Help Needed
Some frustration is beginning to spill over in the Why are there no human apes alive today? thread. Mazzy is ignoring most rebuttals and just repeating his favorite points. The discussion isn't moving forward at all.

Here's an example from my own recent experience. Mazzy first stated that Linnaean taxonomy was based upon ancestry in Message 428:

Mazzy writes:

Percy the Linneaus system is based on the concept of ancestry.

This is a simple error, easy to correct, and I did so in Message 445, stating that it was based upon morphology and providing a couple quotes from Wikipedia. But there was no reply, and then in Message 480 Mazzy repeats the exact same error:

You mean your Linneaus system that presumes ancestry...

I can probably come up with 4 or 5 more examples of ignoring rebuttals just from my own responses to Mazzy, and many of the other participants can probably name 4 or 5 of their own examples.

Mazzy is responding to only 1 out of 4 messages. By no means can he be expected to reply to all messages, not even most, but a good part of the reason his ratio is so out of whack is because the other participants have to keep repeating the points he ignores, and there are a lot them. Some of the other participants are beginning to post rhetorical responses like, "Are you even reading what anybody writes?" and so on.

Mazzy is courteous and sincere for the most part, but as far as actually discussing anything, meh! The responses he gets serve only to provide a reply button for him to use to repeat what he keeps repeating yet again.

--Percy


  
Percy
Member
Posts: 18879
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 297 of 683 (622813)
07-06-2011 3:37 PM


Moderator Help Still Needed
Characterizing every fallacy and misbehavior Mazzy is engaging in would take too much time, so I'll just point to Message 650, a post composed by Nuggin while rightfully very frustrated.

I suppose in capsule form Mazzy could be described as posting nonsense and non sequiturs while ignoring the responses and many corrections. He never quotes anything anyone says. It almost seems that to him the only significance of a response is that it provides a reply button to click.

Mazzy sincerely and strongly believes those he's debating with are wrong, he seeks out links to support his position (though the links are almost always accompanied only by bare assertions rather any argument or presentatoin of evidence), and he's mostly polite and courteous, but since he is very unfamiliar with the process of connecting data to conclusions I don't know what really can be done beyond following the suggestion of a few people to narrow the focus to one or at most a few things at a time.

--Percy


  
Percy
Member
Posts: 18879
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.5


(1)
Message 301 of 683 (622993)
07-07-2011 4:37 PM


Disaster in progress...
Follow this link: Thread in trouble

Oops, wrong link, here it is: Why are there no human apes alive today?

Mazzy could use some help engaging the discussion. Each reply is a repeat of accusations against evolution and evolutionists that doesn't touch on anything being said.

--Percy


Replies to this message:
 Message 304 by Dr Adequate, posted 07-07-2011 4:56 PM Percy has acknowledged this reply
 Message 305 by DBlevins, posted 07-07-2011 7:44 PM Percy has acknowledged this reply

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 18879
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 494 of 683 (653947)
02-25-2012 3:18 PM
Reply to: Message 493 by Buzsaw
02-25-2012 3:05 PM


Re: Dwise1, Portillo, Percy Matter
You could create a Peanut Gallery thread in Coffee House and make corrective comments from there.

--Percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 493 by Buzsaw, posted 02-25-2012 3:05 PM Buzsaw has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 496 by dwise1, posted 03-02-2012 1:50 AM Percy has acknowledged this reply

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 18879
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 541 of 683 (658935)
04-11-2012 9:17 AM
Reply to: Message 539 by dwise1
04-11-2012 1:54 AM


Re: Moderator editting?
dwise1 writes:

I'm also a programmer and we can have an error in our own program that we cannot see, but as soon as someone else looks at it the error jumps right out at them. It's the same with proofreading ourselves. The only technique I have found to be at all effective is to read what we wrote out loud, word for word, even if it's still only inside our head.

If you set the code aside for a month or two (which happens not infrequently because of short-term emergencies) then the errors stand out later.

--Percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 539 by dwise1, posted 04-11-2012 1:54 AM dwise1 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 543 by dwise1, posted 04-11-2012 11:27 AM Percy has acknowledged this reply

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 18879
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 651 of 683 (672262)
09-05-2012 9:32 AM


zi ko in the How novel features evolve #2 thread
Zi Ko is being persistently off-topic in the How novel features evolve #2 thread. See Message 164, then click on "zi ko posts only".

--Percy


Replies to this message:
 Message 654 by Thugpreacha, posted 09-16-2012 10:19 PM Percy has acknowledged this reply

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019