Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8945 total)
33 online now:
caffeine, DrJones*, dwise1, JonF, PaulK, RAZD, Theodoric (7 members, 26 visitors)
Newest Member: ski zawaski
Post Volume: Total: 865,353 Year: 20,389/19,786 Month: 786/2,023 Week: 294/392 Day: 25/129 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 1770 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 262 of 683 (615023)
05-09-2011 6:05 PM
Reply to: Message 259 by Admin
04-29-2011 1:49 PM


Misunderstanding - Need a Ref
I feel that Crashfrog has a tendency to not accept correction when he has misunderstood an opponents point. This usually leads to a discussion to try and clear up the misunderstanding and not the topic. Once the discussion has reached the frustration level, it is difficult and time consuming for moderators to wade through the posts and attempt to find the problem.

Here is a chance to see the problem before it snowballs.

Crashfrog entered the discussion at Message 26 and there are only five posts so far.

I let him know in Message 31 that he was incorrect, which he did not accept and I tried in Message 40 to clarify it further. Now he's at the point of claiming I'm being deceitful.

Could a moderator please review the posts and see if I have made the claims he states.

Thanks
PurpleDawn

Edited by Admin, : Fix message link.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 259 by Admin, posted 04-29-2011 1:49 PM Admin has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 263 by crashfrog, posted 05-09-2011 6:11 PM purpledawn has not yet responded

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 1770 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


(1)
Message 265 of 683 (615076)
05-10-2011 2:45 AM
Reply to: Message 264 by PaulK
05-10-2011 1:40 AM


Re: Misunderstanding - Need a Ref
quote:
In my view you have clearly misunderstood Purpledawn. ...
In fact Purpledawn seems to be saying saying that your "narrow" way to construe it was the "appropriate" way to construe it. ...
All Purpledawn was agreeing with was your description of "worshipping Mammon" - with the additional claim that it argued AGAINST your position.
Your summary is correct. Thank you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 264 by PaulK, posted 05-10-2011 1:40 AM PaulK has not yet responded

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 1770 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 480 of 683 (652444)
02-13-2012 6:39 PM


Panda Cries Deceipt
Panda comes in at Message 55
Cries deceit at Message 75 and Message 83

That's pretty much my standard argument concerning omnipotence since I've been a member.

Killed the discussion. Need a call on whether the cry is justified.

Thanks

Edited by purpledawn, : No reason given.


Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019