Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8943 total)
36 online now:
Newest Member: LaLa dawn
Post Volume: Total: 863,916 Year: 18,952/19,786 Month: 1,372/1,705 Week: 178/446 Day: 74/104 Hour: 9/20


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0
Modulous
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 7789
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


(2)
Message 334 of 683 (627361)
08-02-2011 8:11 AM


nuggin in new york gay marriage
OF COURSE I'M TROLLING!!!

You really think I'm not going to poke that monkey with a stick?! Seriously?

Disrespect, hectoring, needling, goading, trolling. For the past half week. The thread has become a thoroughly unpleasant read. Message 160 in New York Gay Marriage.

Edited by Modulous, : No reason given.


Replies to this message:
 Message 335 by Panda, posted 08-02-2011 10:05 AM Modulous has acknowledged this reply
 Message 336 by Nuggin, posted 08-02-2011 2:12 PM Modulous has responded

Modulous
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 7789
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 337 of 683 (627449)
08-02-2011 2:16 PM
Reply to: Message 336 by Nuggin
08-02-2011 2:12 PM


Re: nuggin in new york gay marriage
this is not a discussion thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 336 by Nuggin, posted 08-02-2011 2:12 PM Nuggin has not yet responded

Modulous
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 7789
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 361 of 683 (631631)
09-02-2011 4:54 AM
Reply to: Message 360 by Larni
09-02-2011 4:05 AM


Re: The recent spammer scoreboard
How do you catch them before they post?

Spambots sometimes spam up their registration details, it can be really obvious.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 360 by Larni, posted 09-02-2011 4:05 AM Larni has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 362 by Panda, posted 09-02-2011 6:35 AM Modulous has acknowledged this reply

Modulous
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 7789
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


(1)
Message 585 of 683 (667369)
07-06-2012 12:47 PM


complete topic derailment alert
Unpaid Work For The Unemployed

Message 234

crashfrog writes:

So you admit, then, that you offered as my position something that you did not intend to accurately represent my position. Charges of dishonesty: upheld.

crashfrog writes:

Saying "you said this" when I didn't, when you know I didn't, is certainly a form of misrepresentation.

crashfrog writes:

So we actually can't talk about anything else, Mod, until we deal with the fact that you're not behaving honestly in this exchange.

crashfrog writes:

But you did, and you dishonestly omit the part where I quoted you doing just that, so that it looks like I've made an accusation without evidence.

crashfrog writes:

But I didn't. That's a fabrication on your part, a fabrication that you constructed by misrepresenting which posts I was describing

crashfrog writes:

Again, Mod - there's nothing to talk about here except your dishonesty because your dishonesty makes it impossible to talk about anything else

Crashfrog has more or less decided to dedicate a whole post to his claims of my dishonesty. It seems as though he intends to discuss nothing else for the remainder of the discussion until I promise to stop it.

Likewise, I feel strongly motivated to defend against charges of dishonesty when made in a public forum. So I'm not going to stop the argument either.

I'm thinking this might warrant moderator attention. Either an enforced stop of the meta-debate and the charges of dishonesty or a move of the thread to Free For All would seem appropriate to me. Though I will abide by the decision of whoever looks into it. I do however, have one request: I assert a right of reply. As the accused, I think the fairest ruling would allow me the 'last word'. If, for example, crashfrog is allowed to put forward his best case for my dishonesty (or perhaps if he replies before moderator intervention occurs), which I am content with him so doing, I will present my rebuttal and we can call it a day.

I am aware it's the coffee house and everything, but I'm thinking there are limits and someone might judge this to have gone beyond them.

Edited by Modulous, : No reason given.


Replies to this message:
 Message 586 by crashfrog, posted 07-06-2012 3:37 PM Modulous has acknowledged this reply

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019