Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 87 (8945 total)
416 online now:
Newest Member: ski zawaski
Happy Birthday: ONESOlivia, perfect
Post Volume: Total: 865,645 Year: 20,681/19,786 Month: 1,078/2,023 Week: 29/557 Day: 29/101 Hour: 4/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0
Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 2 of 683 (580571)
09-10-2010 5:57 AM


Spam

Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 59 of 683 (588762)
10-28-2010 4:18 AM



Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by AdminPD, posted 10-28-2010 6:44 AM Larni has not yet responded

Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 100 of 683 (593755)
11-29-2010 7:10 AM


Money for old rope.
Member feliy000 is offering me 2.5 million via PM.

Can you close her down:

Dearest in the lord,

I am Mrs Felicia.H.Koroma ,from Sierra Leone.I am married to late Mr. Joseph Koroma, who worked with Sierra Leone Embassy in Ivory Coast for Twenty-Six years before he died in the year 2003,after a brief illness that lasted for only five days. We were married for Eighteen years with a duaghter (Edvige) who later died in a motor accident. Before the untimely death of my husband,we were both born again Christians(from Muslim to Christianity). And since after his death I decided not to remarry or get a child outside my matrimonial home which the Bible is against. When my late husband was alive he deposited the sum of (US$2.5M )Two Million,Five hundred Thousand United States Dollars) in a General Trust Account with a prime bank in Abidjan Cote d Ivoire.
Presently,this money is still with the bank. Following my ill health, being a victim to cancer , I have decided to donate this fund to a Christain organizations (Church or person) that will utilize this fund the way I am going to instruct herein,according to the desire of my late husband. I want this fund to be used in Christain Activities like,Orphanages,Christain schools, and Churches for propagating the word of God and to endeavour that the house of God is maintained.The Bible made us to understand that "Blessed is the hand that giveth". I took this decision because I don't have any child that will inherit this money and my husband relatives are not Christians and I don't want my husband's efforts to be used by unbelievers.I don't want a situation where this money will be used in an ungodly way.
This is why I am taking this decision. I am not afraid of death hence I know where I am going. I know that I am going to be in the bosom of the Lord. Exodus 14 VS 14 says that "the lord will fight my case and I shall hold my peace". I don't need any telephone communication in this regard because of my health as well the presence of my husband's relatives around me .I don't want them to know about this development. As soon as I receive your reply I shall give you the contact of the bank here in Abidjan. My happiness is that I lived a life of a worthy Christian. Whoever that Wants to serve the Lord must serve him in spirit and Truth. Please always be prayerful all through your life as well commit me into your daily prayers. Contact me on this e-mail addressfeliciakoroma@datafull.com), any delay in your reply will give me room in sourcing another Church for this same purpose. Please assure me that you will act accordingly as I stated herein. Hoping to
receive your reply immediately .

Remain blessed in the Lord.
Sister Felicia Koroma,
Avenue 4 Marcory residential
14 bp 211 Abidjan 14


Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 101 of 683 (593756)
11-29-2010 7:10 AM


Money for old rope.
Double post.

Edited by Larni, : No reason given.


Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 172 of 683 (606485)
02-25-2011 5:01 PM


Oh dear

Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 360 of 683 (631624)
09-02-2011 4:05 AM
Reply to: Message 359 by Adminnemooseus
09-02-2011 12:56 AM


Re: The recent spammer scoreboard
How do you catch them before they post?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 359 by Adminnemooseus, posted 09-02-2011 12:56 AM Adminnemooseus has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 361 by Modulous, posted 09-02-2011 4:54 AM Larni has not yet responded

Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 383 of 683 (634019)
09-18-2011 9:08 AM
Reply to: Message 382 by Buzsaw
09-18-2011 8:44 AM


Re: Larni Signature Juxtaposing Unidentified Quotes of Members
what I wrote with a less intelligible quote

You're joking' right? Less intelligible? Really?

And anyway, Admin clarified that no attribution was required.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.

Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 382 by Buzsaw, posted 09-18-2011 8:44 AM Buzsaw has not yet responded

Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(2)
Message 387 of 683 (634087)
09-19-2011 3:35 AM
Reply to: Message 386 by Buzsaw
09-18-2011 11:09 PM


Re: Larni Signature Juxtaposing Unidentified Quotes of Members
Buzz, I sought to save you embarrassment by not attributing it.

If you would like me to take it down because you do feel embarrassed or for me to attribute to you so that you are not lumped together with other poster's gibberish I would be happy to comply as a guesture to you.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.

Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 386 by Buzsaw, posted 09-18-2011 11:09 PM Buzsaw has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 388 by Buzsaw, posted 09-19-2011 11:03 AM Larni has responded

Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 389 of 683 (634128)
09-19-2011 1:10 PM
Reply to: Message 388 by Buzsaw
09-19-2011 11:03 AM


Re: Larni Signature Juxtaposing Unidentified Quotes of Members
I shall follow your requests as soon as I get back from the gym.

Would it be acceptable to link your post so all can read the full message, if they wish to do so?

Abe: my apologies for miss spelling your name. I shall make sure I get it right in the future.

Edited by Larni, : Abe


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.

Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 388 by Buzsaw, posted 09-19-2011 11:03 AM Buzsaw has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 390 by Buzsaw, posted 09-19-2011 3:40 PM Larni has responded

Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 391 of 683 (634153)
09-19-2011 5:17 PM
Reply to: Message 390 by Buzsaw
09-19-2011 3:40 PM


Re: Larni Signature Juxtaposing Unidentified Quotes of Members
Done and done.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 390 by Buzsaw, posted 09-19-2011 3:40 PM Buzsaw has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 392 by Buzsaw, posted 09-19-2011 9:13 PM Larni has not yet responded

Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(2)
Message 424 of 683 (638482)
10-22-2011 6:07 PM


Anyone else annoyed by Chuck's debating style?

I am.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 467 of 683 (648625)
01-17-2012 4:31 AM
Reply to: Message 466 by Coyote
01-17-2012 12:59 AM


Re: Dawn has lost it
I fully concur.

On top of it's incomprehensible nature it repeatedly misrepresents what people say and ignores points repeatedly put forwards.

It's really hard to keep one's patience with her.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 466 by Coyote, posted 01-17-2012 12:59 AM Coyote has not yet responded

Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 470 of 683 (648638)
01-17-2012 8:59 AM
Reply to: Message 469 by Admin
01-17-2012 8:34 AM


Re: To Coyote, Larni and Trixie
I forgot it was Coffee House.

Point taken.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 469 by Admin, posted 01-17-2012 8:34 AM Admin has acknowledged this reply

Larni
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 659 of 683 (675714)
10-15-2012 6:58 AM


Spam?
http://www.evcforum.net/dm.php?control=msg&t=16649

My German is il fait froid so I don't know but it probably is.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019