Report Discussion Problems Here 3.0

And what did I do?
Behave better in what way?

That was a generic "you" not a specific "You".The Goose should be treated differently than the Gander.

I've no idea what you did or didn't do.I also thought chuck's comments were quite as offensive as hooah's, but sometimes you have to pick your battles.The E side of EvC is supposed to champion reason and tolerance, and words really aren't sticks or stones. Chuck made a fool of himself--don't follow in his wake.You've certainly made your point. Let it go.

Just curious:How many people on this forum have told you that you're a little bitch?By my count it's about 4 or 5...

Perhaps it should have been none?

Not worth a replyEdited by Theodoric, : I will elevate myself from it

In Message 109 I complained to Larni for juxtaposing, in his signature for all to read, what I wrote with a less intelligible quote of another member without identifying the writer of either.Larni, ignoring the protocol of EvC to identify sources of quotes, refuses to comply with my request until being required to do so by a moderator. Edited by Buzsaw, : fix titleEdited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.

You're joking' right? Less intelligible? Really?And anyway, Admin clarified that no attribution was required.

If a signature is causing problems then moderators will address it (common problems are being offensive or too long), but in this case the problem was some sort of confusion between message and signature, this is from your Message 100: But the signature isn't part of the message, and lack of attribution seems a post facto complaint to cover embarrassment that is unrelated to the original problem.If the members quoted have no objection to Larni attributing them in his signature and Larni doesn't mind updating his signature, then since it now contains three different quotes I think attribution might be a good idea. But signatures represent an opportunity for members to express their individuality, so normally signatures are given a lot of leeway.

25684652 is a dirty filthy spammer{Clean-up completed - Adminnemooseus}Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.

What Larni is doing is personally attacking me on every message he submits. THAT'S A VIOLATION OF FORUM GUIDELINESWe could cherry pick anyone's profile and find a few sour ones to parade before the www. Is that what signatures have become? Places to demean one another?? That's sick!Admin, after, you admitted that my form was not included in that of Dawn et al's why should Larni attach mine with his? Why should his post sigs be attacking anyone? Where are moderators who are suppose to be advocating for the creationist constituency?? I object to the fact that it appears that it's all from one writer. That's quoting multiple sources of data, attributing them to one person.Why should the place it's juxtaposed matter? The signature compounds the attack, being it's in every post of his. It's all public for all to see whether it's in the message or in the signature. Anyone with half a brain & knowledge of the meaning of my words can figure mine out. The other is nothing but meaningless gibberish.My signature is is all my own words so I don't need to identify the source.

Buzz, I sought to save you embarrassment by not attributing it.If you would like me to take it down because you do feel embarrassed or for me to attribute to you so that you are not lumped together with other poster's gibberish I would be happy to comply as a guesture to you.

I'm not ashamed at all of my statement. I want credit for mine and mine alone, but would you be so kind as to cite the context message & thread to which it applies?You know, Larni we can isolate statements of others from many threads which, isolated from context, are not easily understood. The meaning and application are often only understood in context. BTW, it's "Buz," as in "Buzsaw."

I shall follow your requests as soon as I get back from the gym.Would it be acceptable to link your post so all can read the full message, if they wish to do so?Abe: my apologies for miss spelling your name. I shall make sure I get it right in the future. Edited by Larni, : Abe

I'd appreciate that. Thanks very much, Larni.