Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 0/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Biblically, Was Adam The First Man?
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 5 of 109 (580437)
09-09-2010 3:21 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Buzsaw
09-08-2010 10:52 PM


Some other translations, including the KJV use the term "replenish rather than "multiply."
Why would a planet void, cold and dark, having no atmosphere or sun
need to be replenished (abe: with life)?
Replenish comes from the French, replenir itself from the latin plenus - which means 'full'. So four hundred years ago - it probably didn't mean 'to fill up again'. Which is presumably why your more modern translations don't use that word.
abe: the prefix 're' can mean 'again or backwards' as in retard, revolve, reallign but in old French it can be used as an intensive prefix (makes the following word have the same meaning but moreso). As in mankind was instructed not to just fill the world, but really fill the world.
We see this prefix use in redolent (very smelly)
research (to search in depth)
resplendant (very brilliant)
religion (very binding (ligio - as in ligaments))
regret (gret meaning 'to weep')
etc
Edited by Modulous, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Buzsaw, posted 09-08-2010 10:52 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by slevesque, posted 09-09-2010 10:59 AM Modulous has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024