Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9042 total)
610 online now:
PaulK, ringo, xongsmith (3 members, 607 visitors)
Newest Member: maria
Post Volume: Total: 886,148 Year: 3,794/14,102 Month: 99/315 Week: 99/131 Day: 20/29 Hour: 0/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Amino Acid Dating
dwise1
Member
Posts: 4655
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 16 of 34 (580757)
09-10-2010 11:35 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by AZPaul3
09-10-2010 7:40 PM


Re: Don't do it!
Don't date the Aminos. Nothing good could ever come from it.

You racemizatist!!!


This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by AZPaul3, posted 09-10-2010 7:40 PM AZPaul3 has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-11-2010 1:25 AM dwise1 has not yet responded

  
dwise1
Member
Posts: 4655
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 4.5


Message 17 of 34 (580758)
09-10-2010 11:41 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by faith24
09-10-2010 10:33 PM


Can somebody please basically tell me why Jeff Bada made an error in his methodology for dating California skeletons using Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) back in 1983? He was the guy that came with a new way of dating fossils - Amino Acid dating. Here is the article:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v312/n5993/pdf/312442a0.pdf

With all due respect ( fully intended in an absolutely non-Woody Allen manner), faith24 is posing a very serious and earnest question. One which I am not equiped to answer. Please, someone who is able to answer his question, do so.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by faith24, posted 09-10-2010 10:33 PM faith24 has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021