Dawn Bertot writes:
Hence Larni, you have a requirement for the design camp that one does nto have for themeself.
No we don't, snice we don't postulate something "made" the universe, the universe simply is the universe.
Therefore, all things being equal larni, we can only deal with the present physical evidence. evolution draws its conclusions about Macro change from the present limited evidence. If its going to require a designer designing or indicate that we need to see the designer
Then I must require the TOE, to provide evidence that someone or something DID NOT provide the materials in the first place.
No.
You are the one making that claim, therefore
you are the one that needs to provide evidence for it.
If neither of us require such conclusions about our respective tenets, then the present physical evidence will support the design principle soley by the available evidence
And it would still violate parsimony, and is therefore bad science.
To suggest otherwise would be presumpsuous and ILLOGICAL
No, it would be following the rules of science.
™ Version 4.2