The evidence for design and a designer

tesla writes:And that’s just the BBT, our most accepted theory. You can imagine what kind of holes are in 'other' theories.

tesla writes:How much do you trust science? If you truly trust it: then trust them when they say 'we don’t know'.

Dawn Bertot writes:You observe change and I observe order, both are science

Dawn Bertot writes:True, because while crystals or snowflakes may always have the same certain amount of points, the shape is always different or relative, with no one standard, such as the order the molecules demonstrate, to consitently produce a crystal or its numerical denomination, which is always the sameThe order is primarily in its consistent substructure. Some design will be obvious on the outside, but it will also exhibit RELATIVE design with no consistent standard, as in the shape of snowflakes

Dawn Bertot writes:BTW, theres my rule, since you asked

Dawn Bertot writes:Come on now you can do better than that. Lets see some logic, not verbage.

Dawn Bertot writes:Instead of attacking my position with rhetoric, attack its tenets, Jr, then you will impress me. Show me where my logic is faulty

Dawn Bertot writes:Show me where my logic is faultyShow me specifically what I have 'ignored',

Dawn Bertot writes:Careful, you could be in for quite a ride