Hi, Sean, and welcome.
I'd just like to comment on your remark:
seanfhear writes:
I see what you mean by a continueing loss of genetic information. Even if the process went on for a fairly short period of time I guess all you would end up with is an organism with some serious disabilities.
Anglagard was pointing out the
flaw in the "point mutations always mean genetic information loss" argument.
When the process goes on long enough, what you have is evolution.
Dost thou prate, rogue?
-Cassio
Real things always push back.
-William James
™ Version 4.2
