The illogical point he/she was making is that in order for me to justify my claim, shown points must be verified and undisputed by his/her ideological constituency here at EvC town.
In other words they must be submitted for what amounts to peer review so their accuracy can be checked against known reality and the logic of the conclusions can be scrutinized?
Well, ain't science a bummer!
Fact is Buz Ol' Bean, all the evidence you think you and your fellow creationist/ID/designer advocates have ever provided has been shown to be erroneous, mis-interpretation, circular, or out-and-out lie. You and yours have shown us, science and the world absolutely nothing but the depths of stupidity you will stoop to make your fallacious sacred case.
I don't blame you for being reluctant to re-hash the old false "evidence" you have provided in these forums. It must get old having your eyes gouged out and shoved down your throat so often.