Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 52 (9179 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Post Volume: Total: 918,169 Year: 5,426/9,624 Month: 451/323 Week: 91/204 Day: 7/26 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Would ID/Creationists need new, independant dating techniques??
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2300
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 84 of 144 (591268)
11-12-2010 8:14 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by Buzsaw
11-12-2010 8:11 PM


Re: Independent Dating Techniques
The reason I've been arguing for rejecting conventional dating methodology is that the earth and atmosphere was significantly different than post flood.
The implications of all preflood data in the Biblical record indicate a vapor canopy like atmosphere which was likely much larger, extending further into what is now space, the warmer close to earth layers of it effecting expansion into space, consisting a significant more volumn of H2O etc.
You forgot to mention that you have never provided evidence of the imaginary vapor canopy nor have you given an explanation as to how all the various dating methods are wrong and yet still agree with each other.
Edited by DrJones*, : No reason given.

It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds
soon I discovered that this rock thing was true
Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil
Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet
All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world
And so there was only one thing I could do
Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry

Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan
Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by Buzsaw, posted 11-12-2010 8:11 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2300
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 103 of 144 (591301)
11-12-2010 11:18 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by Buzsaw
11-12-2010 11:09 PM


Re: Off topic; I'm not going there, Got that? .
Why are some of you people repeating demands for flood, sudden disaster non-uniform planet model and canopy evidence in this thread which would derail this thread?
Because you claim that this bullshit "model" of yours would alter the verious dating techniques in use today. If you want to say "yes creationists would require new dating techniques to take in to account the effects of the flood" you have to show how the mythical flood would alter the current dating techniques, unless you wish to remain full of shit.
How about some on topic refutation attempts relating to the valid points I've made?
What valid points? you've claimed that the flood would invalidate current dating methods but have never shown how, nor have you been able to explain why all the methods are wrong and yet still agree.

It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds
soon I discovered that this rock thing was true
Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil
Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet
All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world
And so there was only one thing I could do
Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry

Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan
Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by Buzsaw, posted 11-12-2010 11:09 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by Buzsaw, posted 11-12-2010 11:32 PM DrJones* has replied

  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2300
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 111 of 144 (591309)
11-12-2010 11:41 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by Buzsaw
11-12-2010 11:32 PM


Re: Off topic; I'm not going there, Got that? .
I've explained why the flood model premise would not be compatible to conventional dating data
How would your bullshit model affect Ar-Ar dating? how does this model cause Ar-Ar dating to be in error and yet still agree with other methods, show your math or remain full of shit.

It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds
soon I discovered that this rock thing was true
Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil
Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet
All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world
And so there was only one thing I could do
Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry

Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan
Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Buzsaw, posted 11-12-2010 11:32 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024