Stephen Push writes:
Still, they add, neither model can be said to be more real than the other.
A model is "real" only in the sense that it exists and can be observed. It is not the thing that it models. A model of a skyscraper is not a skyscraper.
Two different models of the same thing are equally "real" but one may be an accurate model and the other may not.
"It appears that many of you turn to Hebrew to escape the English...." -- Joseppi