Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8913 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 06-19-2019 9:56 PM
31 online now:
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: 4petdinos
Post Volume:
Total: 854,176 Year: 9,212/19,786 Month: 1,634/2,119 Week: 394/576 Day: 69/128 Hour: 7/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution: Natural selection vs. Godly guidance
Larni
Member
Posts: 3976
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 118 of 154 (589209)
10-31-2010 4:08 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by shadow71
10-31-2010 3:16 PM


Scientists presume that natural selection is the prime moving cause of evolution. How can you prove that if you do not prove how life originated. And if you cannot prove a natural cause for life, then what is left is a designed cause by a supernatural being. God.

Biologists don't presume NS they conclude it; based on evidence.

What does not knowing about the start conditions of life have to do with observing the change in allele frequency over time in a population?

As has been pointed out many time scientist don't 'prove things'.

There could be a supernatural cause for life but there is no more evidence for a supernatural cause than there is for life (and the universe) being a fantastically intricate computer simulation and we are but sentient AIs existing in a virtual reality.

If you are going to say that not being able to 'prove' that life is natural means that one must entertain a supernatural origin then you must give equal weight to a technological origin.

Edited by Larni, : spellink


This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by shadow71, posted 10-31-2010 3:16 PM shadow71 has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019