Try to remember this was a court of law,
Well, that much you are right about.
What that means is that the judge reached his decision based on the evidence that the parties presented to him. By admitting that you haven't read any of the trial transcripts, you have disqualified yourself from having an informed opinion about the correctness of the decision.
You have your own ideas about what evolution consists of, as well as creationism, the law, and fluffy puppy dogs, for all I know. However, your ideas are irrelevant. The judge based his decision on the evidence in the case. Unless you're aware of what the evidence was, your belief about the correctness of the decision is worth no more than my opinion on who should win the Westminster dog show.
Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat