Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,787 Year: 4,044/9,624 Month: 915/974 Week: 242/286 Day: 3/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is there Biblical support for the concept of "Original Sin"?
nwr
Member
Posts: 6411
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 4 of 240 (589553)
11-03-2010 10:49 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by jar
11-01-2010 10:13 PM


It has always seemed to me that Original Sin depends on a gross misreading of the Adam and Eve story. I see that as a story intended to explain what distinguishes humans from other animals. The "sin" bit is just there as a part of the plot.
My experience with preachers, is that they illustrate their sermons with many metaphors, and sometimes use exaggerated rhetoric when presenting those metaphors. And it seems to me that is about what Paul was doing in that oft quoted Romans 5 section.
In summary, no I do not find any biblical support for "original sin".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by jar, posted 11-01-2010 10:13 PM jar has not replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6411
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 159 of 240 (591496)
11-14-2010 12:34 PM
Reply to: Message 152 by Phat
11-14-2010 11:27 AM


Re: Two Questions
Phat writes:
You have all presented your case for why original sin should be questioned and why the Bible can and should be read in context. The conclusion, if accepted, is itself disturbing.
That should not be disturbing. It should be simple ordinary common sense.

Jesus was a liberal hippie

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by Phat, posted 11-14-2010 11:27 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6411
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 161 of 240 (591498)
11-14-2010 12:38 PM
Reply to: Message 157 by Phat
11-14-2010 12:13 PM


Re: Two Questions
jar writes:
Good and bad depend on a human point of view.(...)The character called God in the story is not GOD
Phat writes:
Critics would argue that you cannot know GOD except by reading of His character in the Bible
But can't you tell that the God character in the Adam and Eve story is out of character with what we would normally think of as God? And isn't that part of what makes it obvious that the story is a fable?

Jesus was a liberal hippie

This message is a reply to:
 Message 157 by Phat, posted 11-14-2010 12:13 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 162 by jar, posted 11-14-2010 12:42 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6411
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 164 of 240 (591501)
11-14-2010 1:09 PM
Reply to: Message 163 by Phat
11-14-2010 12:59 PM


Re: Charges of humanism versus Christianity
Phat writes:
My point is that it would be quite disturbing to some if the Bible was proven to be a collection of fables and human interpretations.
I don't think anybody is saying that. We are saying that the Bible is a collection, and that parts (but not all) of that collection are fables. The natural conclusion, is that we have to be discerning readers.

Jesus was a liberal hippie

This message is a reply to:
 Message 163 by Phat, posted 11-14-2010 12:59 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024