Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Golden Age of biblical principles?
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 12 of 144 (589848)
11-04-2010 7:22 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Buzsaw
11-04-2010 11:26 AM


Re: Buz Response To Jar and Frako
Jar, over and over, for years, you and others here at EvC town have been refuted on this count that any of these Dark Age attrocities, perpetrated by the Romish non-Biblical Catholic bishops and popes were sanctioned in the NT or anything Christian Biblically.
Protestants burnt witches and heretics too.
But in any case, let us for the sake of argument say that, when people went around burning other people, they were No True Christians and that these were ages in which not-really-Christianity held sway. Then these periods, therefore, were not the golden age of Biblical principles, according to Buz. We shall make a note of it.
So when was?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Buzsaw, posted 11-04-2010 11:26 AM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by jar, posted 11-04-2010 7:32 PM Dr Adequate has not replied
 Message 22 by Buzsaw, posted 11-05-2010 8:59 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 16 of 144 (589877)
11-04-2010 9:04 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Buzsaw
11-04-2010 8:57 PM


Re: Buz Response To Jar and Frako
The RCC Inquisition, i.e death and torture lasted for centuries from the 12th century, officially ending in the 19th century.
So, I guess that wasn't a golden age.
When was?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Buzsaw, posted 11-04-2010 8:57 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by frako, posted 11-05-2010 6:59 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 20 of 144 (589950)
11-05-2010 8:34 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Dawn Bertot
11-05-2010 8:26 AM


Re: Buz Response To Jar and Frako
Well, your ravings aside, the question is a very simple one.
When precisely, were the good old days --- the time when people were Christians and everything was just dandy?
All you have to do is name a date. Any time in the last 2,000 years is good.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-05-2010 8:26 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-05-2010 8:54 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 25 of 144 (589962)
11-05-2010 9:35 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by Buzsaw
11-05-2010 8:59 AM


Re: Biblical Principle Golden Age, When And Where?
LoL, Doc. These actions perpetrated by these Protestant zealots were not Biblical NT sanctioned.
But I'm not saying that they were.
Let us say, for the sake of argument, that when Catholics burnt Protestants and when Protestants burnt Catholics and when Protestants burnt other Protestants for being the wrong kind of Protestants, they weren't being real "NT sanctioned" Christians.
Fine.
But what you have been asked --- what you have been asked repeatedly --- what I am now asking you again --- is to tell us when was the Golden Age when real proper Christians were in charge and everything was hunky-dory.
All you have to do is name a date. When were the Good Old Days?
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Buzsaw, posted 11-05-2010 8:59 AM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Buzsaw, posted 11-05-2010 10:34 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 28 of 144 (589977)
11-05-2010 10:51 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by Buzsaw
11-05-2010 10:34 AM


Re: Biblical Principle Golden Age, When And Where?
What? Miniscule and short lived timeframe ...
And I am sure that this would be a great consolation to the people who were tortured and then burned alive by Protestants. When they died in agony in the flames, they must have received much consolation from the fact that some guy like you in the twenty-first century would call their suffering "minuscule and short lived".
NOW WILL YOU ANSWER THE QUESTION?
You and people like you lament our secular society because we have fallen away from the golden age of Christianity.
When and where did this golden age take place?
It's a very direct and simple question. All we want is a place and a date.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Buzsaw, posted 11-05-2010 10:34 AM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Buzsaw, posted 11-05-2010 11:44 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 32 of 144 (590001)
11-05-2010 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Buzsaw
11-05-2010 11:44 AM


Re: Biblical Principle Golden Age, When And Where?
DA, it appears that Jar's MO of repeating answered questions is rubbing off on you. Sad.
Years before I met Jar, I realized that the question a person wants to duck and evade is the question that I should press him to answer.
Now, whether or not I am like jar, I should like you to answer the question.
When was the Golden Age of Christianity?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Buzsaw, posted 11-05-2010 11:44 AM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Phat, posted 11-05-2010 12:57 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 35 of 144 (590020)
11-05-2010 1:24 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Dawn Bertot
11-05-2010 8:26 AM


Re: Buz Response To Jar and Frako
Hey frako you heard of the guy that challenged God to a creation attempt and God scooped up a handful of sand created a human and the scientist said no problem
He scooped up a handful of sand and God said "wait a minute, YOU GET YOUR OWN SAND."
Uh ... but stop me if I'm wrong ... but this is actually a lie, isn't it?
It didn't actually happen, did it? It's something that someone made up, isn't it?
So ... do lies have any bearing on any issue whatsoever?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-05-2010 8:26 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by jar, posted 11-05-2010 1:32 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 41 of 144 (590226)
11-06-2010 9:57 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by Dawn Bertot
11-06-2010 9:14 PM


Re: Buz Response To Jar and Frako
To quote a wise man, I think he was called Dawn Bertot --- "nice dodge".
For fuck's sake, all you have to do is name a time and a place. You won't do it, Buz won't do it ... it didn't actually exist, did it?
If you think that it did, then simply name the time and the place.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-06-2010 9:14 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-06-2010 11:09 PM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 43 of 144 (590235)
11-06-2010 11:38 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Dawn Bertot
11-06-2010 11:09 PM


Re: It seems such a nutty topic for a thread
Your tantrums are ... interesting.
But they do not answer the question.
Let me restate it. Buz seems to think that there were good old days when everyone was a Christian and therefore everything was peachy.
If you disagree with this proposition, please say so. If you agree with this proposition, please tell us where and when was the Golden Age.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-06-2010 11:09 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-07-2010 5:37 PM Dr Adequate has replied
 Message 59 by Buzsaw, posted 11-07-2010 7:23 PM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 45 of 144 (590246)
11-07-2010 2:50 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by Dawn Bertot
11-06-2010 11:09 PM


Re: It seems such a nutty topic for a thread
Temper temper, boy, calm down. As has already been indicated to you, it is a loaded nonsensical question. As I have inidicated to you are speaking about an ideology, in christianity. Its a rule of the heart and mind and many times lands
can you think of a time or place where any ideology was believed and accepted by every single person, ouside the Church, or Judism, in this instance
DA, the question posed by Theo, seems to me to be nonsensical
But Im sure there have been many instances throughout history where Christianity served as the rule of principles in individual places
Wouldnt you say the 1800s in this country, were a time where Christianity dominated the thinking of both the land and the people? I would
Then think of the numerous civilizations that have risen and fallen, that had Christianity as a part, at times, as its religion. Where it enjoyed the supreme rule in both the land and people
This is why I asked for parameters of his meaning. It seems such a silly query as Theo has threaded it
Dawn Bertot
A time. A place.
It's such a simple question.
But you know, you don't have to be wrong about everything. For example, just because sane people tell you that pigs don't have wings, that doesn't mean that you have to assert that pigs have wings. Sure, creationism has driven you crazy, we can see that. But that doesn't mean that you have to believe every crazy statement. You could let this one go.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-06-2010 11:09 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 57 of 144 (590350)
11-07-2010 6:45 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by Dawn Bertot
11-07-2010 5:37 PM


Re: It seems such a nutty topic for a thread
What implication is being derived from the question posed?
Are you saying because Christianity does not have rule all the time everywhere that it is therefore invalid?
That it is ineffective or what.
Even if Christianity was not always the rule somewhere is your implication that it is not from God?
No, no-one has said that.
Buz seems to be claiming that there were Good Old Days when people lived up to Christian principles and everything was peachy.
Maybe if everyone did live up to Christian principles then everything would be peachy. That's not the subject under discussion. The question is, was there a Golden Age? Is our modern secular culture actually worse than some imagined time when everyone loved Jesus? Did such a time even exist?
I gave you the example of the 1800s in this country to which you paid no attention
Ah yes, the 1800s. Slavery, illiteracy, disenfranchisement of women, the Ku Klux Klan and the Civil War.
The good old days.
Would you actually rather live then than now? If not, then those were not the good old days.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-07-2010 5:37 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-07-2010 11:41 PM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 58 of 144 (590352)
11-07-2010 6:51 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by Dawn Bertot
11-07-2010 6:37 PM


Re: It seems such a nutty topic for a thread
Because the answer is always going to be relative, depending on who is viewing the results ...
Well, sure, there's an element of subjectivity to it.
So let's hear your own subjective answer. Would you really rather live in the nineteenth century? Without inoculation, without antibiotics, without anesthesia?
On the upside, your children would be taught creationism in school. On the downside, they'd be dead.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-07-2010 6:37 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 67 of 144 (590379)
11-07-2010 9:17 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Buzsaw
11-07-2010 7:23 PM


Re: It seems such a nutty topic for a thread
Mmm, no, Dr Adequate, that's never been my position.
Okay, then you can stop lamenting the Golden Age which didn't actually exist.
It has long been, also the most benevolent nation ever, sacrificing our best young men in wars, liberating the oppressed, without grabbing those nations and adding them to our, empire as Russia did, i.e the block of Communist nations, including East Germany in the last century.
I can think of some people who might disagree with that.
For example, the A'ananin, the Abenaki, the Absaalooke, the Achumawi, the Acjachemen, the Acoma, the Agua Caliente, the Adai, the Ahtna, the Ajachemen, the Akimel O'odham, the Akwaala, the Alabama-Coushatta, the Aleut, the Alutiiq, the Algonquians, the Alliklik, the Alnobak, the Alsea, the Andaste, the Anishinaabe, the Aniyunwiya, the Antoniao, the Apache, the Apalachee, the Applegate, the Apsaalooke, the Arapaho, the Arawak, the Arikara, the Assiniboine, the Atakapa, the Atikamekw, the Atsina, the Atsugewi, the Araucano, the Avoyel, the Ayisiyiniwok, the Aymara, the Aztecs, the Babine, the Bannock, the Barbareo, the Bari, the Bear River tribe, the Beaver tribe, the Bella Bella, the Bella Coola, the Beothuks, the Bidai, the Biloxi, the Black Carib, the Blackfoot, the Blood Indians, the Bora, the Caddo, the Cahita, the Cahto, the Cahuilla, the Calapooya, the Calusa, the Carib, the Carquin, the Carrier, the Caska, the Catawba, the Cathlamet, the Cayuga, the Cayuse, the Celilo, the Central Pomo, the Chahta, the Chalaque, the Chappaquiddick, the Chawchila, the Chehalis, the Chelan, the Chemehuevi, the Cheraw, the Cheroenhaka, the Cherokee, the Chetco, the Cheyenne, the Chickamaugan, the Chickasaw, the Chilcotin, the Chilula-Wilkut, the Chimariko, the Chinook, the Chipewyan, the Chippewa, the Chitimacha, the Chocheno, the Choctaw, the Cholon, the Chontal Maya, the Choynimni, the Chukchansi, the Chumash, the Clackamas, the Clallam, the Clatskanie, the Clatsop, the Cmique, the Coastal Cree, the Cochimi, the Cochiti, the Cocopa, the Coeur d'Alene, the Cofan, the Columbia, the Colville, the Comanche, the Comcaac, the Comox, the Conestoga, the Coos, the Copper River Athabaskan, the Coquille, the Cora, the Coso, the Costanoan, the Coushatta, the Cowichan, the Cowlitz, the Cree, the Creek, the Croatan, the Crow, the Cruzeo, the Cuna, the Cucupa, the Cupeo, the Cupik, the Dakelh, the Dakota, the Dakubetede, the Dawson, the Deg Xinag, the Delaware, the Dena'ina, the Dene, the Dene Suline, the Dene Tha, the Diegueno, the Dine, the Dogrib, the Dohema, the Dumna, the Dunne-za, the Eastern Inland Cree, the Eastern Pomo, the Eel River Athabascan, the Eenou, the Eskimo, the Esselen, the Etchemin, the Euchee, the Eudeve, the Excelen, the Eyak, the Fernandeno, the Flathead Salish, the Fox, the Gabrielino, the Gae, the Gaigwu, the Galibi, the Galice, the Garifuna, the Gashowu, the Gitxsan, the Gosiute, the Gros Ventre, the Guarani, the Guarijio, the Gulf Indians, the Gwich'in, the Haida, the Haisla, the Halkomelem, the Hn, the Hanis, the Hare, the Hatteras, the Haudenosaunee, the Havasupai, the Hawaiians, the Heiltsuk, the Heve, the Hiaki, the Hichiti, the Hidatsa, the Hocak, the Holikachuk, the Homalco, the Hoopa, the Hopi, the Hopland Pomo, the Hualapai, the Huelel, the Huichol, the Huichun, the Hupa, the Huron, the Illini, the Incas, the Ineseo, the Ingalik, the Innoko, the Innu, the Inuktitut, the Iowa-Oto, the Iroquois Confederacy, the Ishak, the Isleo, the Isleta, the Itza Maya, the Iviatim, the Iynu. the James Bay Cree, the Jemez, the Juaneno, the Juichun. the Kabinapek, the Kainai, the Kalapuya, the Kalina, the Kanenavish, the Kanien'kehaka, the Kalispel, the Kansa, the Karankawa, the Karkin, the Karok, the Kashaya, the Kaska, the Kaskaskia, the Kathlamet, the Kato, the Kaw, the Kenaitze, the Keres, the Kichai, the Kickapoo, the Kiliwa, the Kiowa, the Kiowa Apache, the Kitanemuk, the Kitsai, the Klahoose, the Klallam, the Klamath-Modoc, the Klatskanie, the Klatsop, the Klickitat, the Koasati, the Kolchan, the Konkow, the Konomihu, the Kootenai, the Koso, the Koyukon, the Kuitsh, the Kulanapo, the Kumeyaay, the Kuna, the Kupa, the Kusan, the Kuskokwim, the Kutchin, the Kwaiailk, the Kwakiutl, the Kwalhioqua, the Kwantlen, the Kwapa, the Kwinault, the Laguna, the Lakota, the Lakmiak, the Lassik, the Laurentian, the Lecesem, the Lenape, the Lillooet, the Lipan Apache, the Listiguj, the Lnuk, the Lokono, the Loucheux, the Loup, the Lower Chehalis, the Lower Coquille, the Lower Cowlitz, the Lower Tanana, the Lower Umpqua, the Luckiamute, the Luiseo, the Lumbee, the Lummi, the Lushootseed, the Lutuamian, the Macushi, the Mahican, the Maidu, the Maina, the Makah, the Makushi, the Maliseet, the Mandan, the Mapuche, the Maricopa, the Massachusett, the Massasoit, the Mattabesic Mattole, the Maumee, the Matlatzinca, the Mayan, the Mayo, the Mengwe, the Menominee, the Mescalero-Chiricahua, the Meskwaki, the Metis Creole, the Miami-Illinois, the Miccosukee, the Michif, the Micmac, the Migueleo, the Mikasuki, the Mi'kmaq, the Mingo, the Minqua, the Minsi, the Minto, the Miskito, the Missouria, the Miwok, the Mixe, the Mixtec, the Modoc, the Mohave, the Mohawk, the Mohegan, the Mohican, the Mojave, the Molale, the Monache, the Montagnais, the Montauk, the Moosehide, the Multnomah, the Munsee, the Muskogee, the Musqueam, the Mutsun, the Nabesna, the Nadot'en , the Nahane , the Nahuat, the Nahuatl, the Nakoda, the Nambe, the Nanticoke, the Nantucket, the Narragansett, the Naskapi, the Nass-Gitxsan, the Natchez, the Natick, the Naugutuck, the Navajo, the Nawat, the Nayhiyuwayin, the Nde, the Nee-me-poo, the Nehiyaw, the Netela, the New Blackfoot, the Newe, the Nez Perce, the Niantic, the Nicola, the Niitsipussin, the Nimiipuu, the Nipmuc, the Nisenan, the Nisga'a, the Nlaka'pamux, the Nomlaki, the Nooksack , the Nootka, the Nootsak, the Northeastern Pomo, the Northern Carrier Indians, the Northern Cheyenne, the Nottoway, the Nuu-chaa-nulth, the Nuxalk, the Obispeo, the Ocuilteco, the Odawa, the Ofo, the Ogahpah, the Ohlone, the Ojibwa, the Oji-Cree, the Okanagan, the Okwanuchu, the Old Blackfoot, the Omaha-Ponca, the Oneida, the Onondaga, the O'ob No'ok, the O'odham, the Opata, the Osage, the Otchipwe, the Otoe, the Ottawa , the Pai, the Paipai, the Paiute, the Palaihnihan, the Palewyami, the Palouse, the Pamlico, the Panamint, the Papago-Pima, the Pascua Yaqui, the Passamaquoddy, the Patuxet, the Patwin, the Paugussett, the Pawnee, the Peigan, the Pend D'Oreille, the Penobscot, the Pentlatch, the Peoria, the Pequot, the Picuris, the Piegan, the Pima, the Pima Bajo, the Pipil, the Pit River Indians, the Pojoaque, the Pomo, the Ponca, the Poospatuck, the Popoluca, the Potawatomi, the Powhatan, the Pueblo, the Puget Sound Salish tribe, the Purisimeo, the Putn, the Quapaw, the Quechan, the Quechua, the Quilcene, the Quileute, the Quinault, the Quinnipiac, the Quiripi, the Raramuri, the Restigouche, the Rumsen, the Runasimi, the Saanich, the Sac, the Sahaptin, the Salhulhtxw, the Salinan, the Salish, the Samish, the Sandia, the San Felipe, the San Ildefonso, the San Juan, the Sanpoil, the Santa Ana, the Santa Clara, the Santiam, the Santo Domingo, the Saponi, the Sarcee, the Sastean, the Satsop, the Savannah, the Sauk, the Saulteaux, the Schaghticoke, the Sechelt, the Secwepemc, the Sekani, the Selkirk, the Seminoles, the Seneca, the Seri, the Serrano, the Seshelt, the Severn Ojibwe, the Shanel, the Shasta, the Shawnee, the Shinnecock, the Shoshone, the Shuar, the Shuswap, the Siksika, the Siletz, the Similkameen, the Sinkiuse , the Sinkyone, the Sioux, the Siuslaw, the Skagit, the Skicin, the S'Klallam, the Skokomish, the Skraeling, the Skwamish, the Slavey, the Sliammon, the Sm'algyax, the Snichim, the Snohomish, the Songish, the Sooke, the Souriquois, the Southeastern Pomo, the Southern Paiute, the Spokane, the Squamish, the Stadaconan, the St'at'imcets, the Stockbridge, the Sto:lo, the Stoney, the Straits Salish, the Sugpiaq, the Suquamish, the Susquehannock, the Suwal, the Swampy Cree, the Swinomish, the Tabasco Chontal, the Tachi, the Taensa, the Tahltan, the Tagish, the Tahcully, the Taino, the Takelma, the Takla, the Taltushtuntude, the Tamyen, the Tanacross, the Tanaina, the Tanana, the Tano, the Taos, the Tarahumara, the Tataviam, the Tauira, the Teguime, the Tehachapi, the Ten'a, the Tenino, the Tepehuano, the Tequistlateco, the Tesuque, the Tetes-de-Boules, the Tewa, the Thompson, the Tigua, the Tillamook, the Timbisha, the Timucua, the Tinde, the Tinneh, the Tiwa, the Tjekan, the Tlahuica, the Tlatskanie, the Tlatsop, the Tlicho Dinne, the Tlingit, the Tohono O'odham, the Tolowa, the Tongva, the Tonkawa, the Towa, the Tsalagi, the Tsattine, the Tsekani, the Tsetsehestahese, the Tsetsaut, the Tsilhqot'in, the Tsimshian, the Tsitsistas, the Tsooke, the Tsoyaha, the Tsuu T'ina, the Tualatin, the Tubar, the Tubatulabal, the Takudh, the Tulalip, the Tumpisa, the Tunica, the Tupi, the Tuscarora, the Tutchone, the Tutelo, the Tututni, the Tuwa'duqutsid, the Twana, the Twatwa, the Uchi, the Ukiah, the Ukomnom, the Umatilla, the Unami, the Unangan, the Unkechaug, the Upper Chehalis, the Upper Chinook, the Upper Cowlitz, the Upper Tanana, the Upper Umpqua, the Ute, the Ventureo, the Virginian Algonkin , the Wailaki, the Wailatpu, the Walapai, the Walla Walla, the Wampano, the Wampanoag, the Wanapam, the Wanki, the Wappinger, the Wappo, the Warijio, the Warm Springs Indians, the Wasco-Wishram, the Washoe, the Wazhazhe, the Wea, the Wenatchi, the Wendat, the Weott, the Western Pomo, the Whilkut, the White Clay People, the Wichita, the Wikchamni, the Willapa, the Winnebago, the Wintu, the Wishram, the Witsuwit'en, the Wiyot, the Wolastoqewi, the Wyandot, the Yakama, the Yanesha, the Yaquina, the Yavapai, the Yawelmani, the Yaqui, the Yinka Dene, the Yneseo, the Yocot'an, the Yokaia, the Yokuts, the Yoncalla, the Yowlumni, the Ysleo, the Ysleta del Sur, the Yucatec Maya, the Yuchi, the Yuma, the Yupik, the Yurok, the Zapotec, the Zia, the Zimshian, the Zoque, and the Zuni.
But apart from that, you guys hardly conquered anyone. "Grabbing nations"? Hardly! Not many nations, anyway. A few hundred ... is that really significant? "Empire"? Not unless half a continent counts. It's not as though it's a big continent.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Buzsaw, posted 11-07-2010 7:23 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by Buzsaw, posted 11-09-2010 8:47 PM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 69 of 144 (590395)
11-07-2010 11:51 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by Dawn Bertot
11-07-2010 11:41 PM


Re: It seems such a nutty topic for a thread
You have not even attempted a rational explanation of what you mean by Golden age.
It's not my claim.
If Buz went around claiming that he had a pet unicorn it wouldn't be up to me to say what he meant by "unicorn".
Now you switch gears. I thought we were discussing a time when people honored the Christian principles more than others and when they were used as a rule of the land
Im sure at this point you can begin to see why such a query as Theos is utter nonsense
Anybody can make a list of those things described above in any age.
When I do answer your question you change directions and avoid the obvious point
Presumably when you wrote this gibberish you thought that it meant something.
Please do tell everyone --- what is the "obvious point"? And in what sense is it "obvious"?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-07-2010 11:41 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-07-2010 11:56 PM Dr Adequate has replied
 Message 72 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-08-2010 12:01 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 310 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 73 of 144 (590400)
11-08-2010 12:22 AM
Reply to: Message 71 by Dawn Bertot
11-07-2010 11:56 PM


Re: It seems such a nutty topic for a thread
The obvious point is that the query makes no sense unless he can show relevance. I can repeat that again if yopu dont understand it
Do you understand it?
No. As usual, you have posted incomprehensible gibberish.
I believe that you've said that English isn't your first language, but that's not your main problem. Your real problem is that the stuff you say doesn't make any darn sense --- not just in the sense that it's wrong (which it often is) but that it's meaningless. When you manage to say something so meaningful as to be actually wrong, that's you having a good day.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-07-2010 11:56 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-08-2010 11:16 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024