I have no evidence that this is a brain but it was created by one(if it grows onto one it could grow into one); mine. I could not find the thread where you were asking me to flesh in the notion of recursion and somatic cells. This is it.
To BEN
Here are four surface sentence areas that remand a potentially existant recursivity in flesh if not blood also.
It requires a discursive function materialized by photons correlated with thermal contact electrons through opposite measurable groups due to differences of attractions and repulsions.
This effects a structure dependent symmetry property of DNA sequence data recursively nameable by panbiogeographic attributes constrained by macrothermodynamic boundaries provided by hierarchical thermodynamic inorganics.
The extension of the time these operations sustain for the duration that can be simulated under is forward infinite, conditioning the effective underlying algebra that links the panbiogeographic baseline through an arbitrary thermostat to the appearance (but not actual existence) of action at a distance, visible by the shape of levels of biological organization quantum mechanically.
The two kinds of 1-D symmetry instruct a served syntax to contruct recursive predictions that divide Gibbs/Gladyshev minimization congruently between molecular and biogeographic clades such that space and time are schemeatically formed of ever larger Real Number orders of higher order pin points place-space in an organon of catastrophe set space.
I think this language performs responds to Chomsky’s “biology” where he said in an on-going reply to Quine,
quote:
“Consider the ”as yet unknown innate structures’ mentioned in this passage. Since they are “as yet unknown innate structures” mentioned in this passage. Since they are “as yet unknown,” presumably they are “knowable,” or to but it more properly, hypotheses concerning these innate structures have exactly the status of propositions of natural science, and in fact are simply a part of biology.
p187 reference below.
The passages I wrote first, I think establish this “part of biology” at least in a first part.
What really did bedevil me at Cornell was the assertion and apparent facial naiveté that genetic experiments on fruit flies still contained “unknowns” AFTER the experiment was over. To show that the reference of ”innateness’ as quoted above is similar to that used in teaching biology at Cornell and by my Grandfather WF Stanely at SUNY Fredonia , told to me as a teenager etc would be difficult but I suspect is not impossible.
The passage of Quine is below (page 187)
Learning by ostension is learning by simple induction, and the mechanism of such learning is conditioning. But this method is notoriously incapable of carrying us far in language. This is why, on the translational side, we are soon driven to what I have called analytical hypotheses. The as yet unknown innate structures, additional to mere quality space, that are needed in language-learning, are needed specifically to get the child over this great hump that lies beyond ostension, or induction. If Chomsky’s antiempiricism or antibehaviorism says merely that the conditioning is insufficient to explain language-learning, then the doctrine is of a piece with my doctrine of the indeterminacy of translation.
Reference -Reflections on Language, Noam Chomsky Pantheon Book
This is the altavist ENGLISH-GERMAN-ENGLISH babblefish determination
It requires a deviating function, which is carried out by the photons, which are referred one on the other with thermal contact contacts by the opposite measurable groups because of the differences of the attraction and the repulsions. This causes a dependent symmetry characteristic of the structure of the DNA sequence data recursively, which are nameable by panbiogeographic the attributes, which are limited by those macro-thermaldynamic borders, which are made available by the hierarchical thermodynamic inorganics. The extension of the time, which these enterprises support during the duration, which under it be simulated can is forward of endlessly and the effective underlying algebra to cause, which connects panbiogeographic the baseline by an arbitrary thermostat with the appearance (however not actual existence) to the activity in a distance, visibly by the form of the levels of the biological organization quantity mechanical. The two kinds of symmetry 1-D point a served syntax contruct to the recursive forecasts on, which divide Gibbs/Gladyshev reduction in such a way congruently between the molecular and biogeographical clades that space and time are formed schemeatically of the area of the disaster set by the ever larger material orders for number higher order of the pin points place area in a Organon.
cause and effect do not translate!!
This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 03-08-2006 04:27 PM
™ Version 4.2
