Simple evidence for ID

how about filling yours out on your proposed thread then?what is your simple evidence to ID and how do we determine if it is design or "fate" that has been behind it?"que sera sera" is not much to base a theology on.I have other questions if you are going to pursue this.

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

what a cute baby ...with a specialized finger just for extracting bugs from deep inside wood burrows.what's to say what happens when the interface between man and machine blurs and neural connections are possible?

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

s'okay.

I disagree.different code words could have survival benefit in battles between competing tribes, as well as having to come up with new words for new experiences.there are studies that map the evolution of the various languages and dialects, and they match the cultural dispersal maps.there are few base languages, which shows that while most have evolved from others (including some cross-connections), it is quite possible that language itself had numerous independant evolutions{edited to add punctuation to last paragraph for clarity}This message has been edited by RAZD, 04*24*2005 05:52 PM

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

Unfortunately it's now evolved to the point that people who still say "your momma is so fat" now get censored in spite of it actually being true. So much for anachronistic pre-emptive strikes.

It depends on what you are designing for as well. If you are trying for perfection out of the box, then it would be reasonable to think that the best effort was put forward and the results would show this. If on the other hand you are trying for a maximum diversity of solutions, then a system that has "happy accidents" built into it has a higher probability of original solutions. Those same cultural differences also equate to different perspectives in approaching a problem, and a maximum diversity in culture would mean a maximum probability of original solutions.Of course the problem then is communication between cultural groups so that overall knowledge is increased and there is a feedback into other problems from all those diverse perspectives.I also wonder if slowing neurons down makes for a better product biologically, due to the limits in the way information could be stored, vesus a faster delivery system than storage could process. This gets into the biological limitations on storage systems.

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

tommorrow. my brain needs some intelligent redesign to cope with fatigue ....

sorry for the delay. I think we can agree that the self evident fundamental lack of perfection in this universe would indicate that this design approach was not used here. I've heard it said that a thought takes about 2 seconds, but whether this is true or just indicative is irrelevent to the fact that thought takes significantly more time in a brain than in a computer.This may be an evolved way of coping with {biological systems\organic reactions} but it may also be the way that our brain associates information: they are time linked, {blurred together\superimposed} by a slower processing system.The result could be a number of similar information bits that include linked information --
{hat\feathers}
{hat\ribbons}
{hat\flaps}
{hat\colors}
etc, and that this leads to {cognitive\conceptual\creative} links between say ribbons and flaps. it's about the obvious perfection of the biological system ...(There was a topic? )

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

That was my conclusion too.Doing a google, there is a Kevin Scott in East Sussexand the title of the webpage is "dare to question" ...This message has been edited by RAZD, 04*09*2006 11:56 AM

No probs, as long as you participate in the discussions rather than push an agenda eh?So is that your website? If so you might want to put that message in your signature.

---

Join the effort to unravel {AIDS\HIV} with Team EvC! (click)

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand

​

RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.