Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,822 Year: 4,079/9,624 Month: 950/974 Week: 277/286 Day: 38/46 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What prevents micro evolution from becoming macro evolution
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 7 of 25 (590357)
11-07-2010 7:10 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Percy
11-07-2010 6:23 PM


Because your characterization of the position of evolutionary biologists was incomplete, this characterization of the position of creationists fails to address the fact that deleterious mutations are removed from populations by natural selection and are not included among the mutations that accumulate.
I'm not sure why you think this. There is plenty of pop. gen. and comparative genetic evidence for fixation of deleterious mutations. Certainly the trends for beneficial and deleterious mutations are as you desribe, but in the real world there is plenty of evidence of deleterious mutations accumulating.
The real question is, as Slevesque posits, whether such mutations are balanced by compensating beneficial mutations or conversely whether organismal fitness is in an irreversible decline, for which there is no evidence except in some organisms with drastically reduced population sizes.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Percy, posted 11-07-2010 6:23 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Percy, posted 11-07-2010 7:26 PM Wounded King has not replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 8 of 25 (590359)
11-07-2010 7:20 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by slevesque
11-07-2010 5:06 PM


Truly schoolboy errors
Both group realize that these muations are copying errors during the transcription of the genetic code.
When you want to try and frame an opening post about science it would probably be good not to get half of it wrong.
Transcription is the process whereby a DNA strand template is used to produce mRNA, when DNA is copied it is called replication. The genetic code also specifically refers to the complementarity of certain codons for certain amino acids. What is copied during replication, and transcribed in transcription, are genetic sequences.
Terms like 'transcription' and 'Genetic code' have specific well defined meanings in molecular genetics, couldn't you try and adhere to them?
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by slevesque, posted 11-07-2010 5:06 PM slevesque has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024