adMinnieMouse writes:
I have an idea of what you were trying to do here but at the minimum I think you blotched some of your wordings. In the above quoted you seem to be saying the oldest Thrinaxodon fossil is the same age as the oldest Ericiolacerta fossil. I don't think this is what you were trying to say. I'm guessing you intended:
All Thrinaxodon fossils date older than the oldest Ericiolacerta fossil".
I may not be understanding your post or frako's (I may be a moron, but I tend to doubt it.) So far as I can tell, the top aminal is intended to be Eric and the second one is Thrina. None of the samples of Thrina we have are older than the earliest sample of the more primitive Eric. The third dude, who is even more lemurian and less ratty, is Megaz. No Megaz is older than the oldest Thrina. And so on down through monkeys and apes, to us. All the critters are nested chronologically, such that the rats appear to be growing hands, losing their tails, standing up, grabbing tools, building computers, and calling each other asshats, in that specific order.
Edited by Iblis, : ouroboros
™ Version 4.2
