go at refuting the pertinent points posted
I addressed the only pertinent part of your post; your lack of knowledge of what a null hypothesis is. The rest is off-topic BS.
The topic of the thread is:
Does the ID methodology follow the Scientific method, for it to be considered science and therefore teachable in the science classroom, regardless of eithers conclusions
With your babbling on about the"MSM" you quite clearly are admitting that the ID methodology does not follow the scientific method but some other make-believe methodology.
It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds
soon I discovered that this rock thing was true
Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil
Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet
All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world
And so there was only one thing I could do
Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod MinistryLive every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan
Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On
*not an actual doctor