Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,839 Year: 4,096/9,624 Month: 967/974 Week: 294/286 Day: 15/40 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does ID follow the scientific method?
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 130 of 325 (592472)
11-20-2010 11:02 AM
Reply to: Message 127 by Dawn Bertot
11-20-2010 10:52 AM


Re: Question everything
Dawn Bertot writes:
Is it possible that all of this could be a designed product in the same way the Genesis planet was on Star Trek?
Yes, it is possible.
Now show us how you use the ID method to design an experiment to test that hypothesis.

"It appears that many of you turn to Hebrew to escape the English...." -- Joseppi

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-20-2010 10:52 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-20-2010 4:25 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 146 of 325 (592533)
11-20-2010 4:37 PM
Reply to: Message 144 by Dawn Bertot
11-20-2010 4:25 PM


Re: Question everything
Dawn Bertot writes:
ringo writes:
Now show us how you use the ID method to design an experiment to test that hypothesis.
Here is how
from post 131: Bertot writes: *snip*
I asked you to design an experiment. You're standing on the surface of a planet. You've hypothesized that it was designed as some sort of "Genesis Project". What specific data are you going to collect to test that hypothesis? What equipment will you use to collect the data? How will you analyze the data?

"It appears that many of you turn to Hebrew to escape the English...." -- Joseppi

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-20-2010 4:25 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-20-2010 4:46 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 151 of 325 (592545)
11-20-2010 4:58 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by Dawn Bertot
11-20-2010 4:46 PM


Re: Question everything
Dawn Bertot writes:
I did and you paid no attention to it at all.
No you didn't. I asked you to specify exactly what data you would look for to determine whether the Genesis Planet was designed. I asked you what equipment you would use and how you would analyze the data. You answered none of those questions.
Dawn Bertot writes:
The test/experiment would be the same, if were god or a small green alien.
The question isn't "who" the designer is. The question is: How would you design an experiment to detect design in the first place. What exactly would you plunk down on the lab bench?
I'm not asking for a general approach. I'm asking for one simple specific experiment.
Edited by ringo, : Fixed cApitAlizatiN.

"It appears that many of you turn to Hebrew to escape the English...." -- Joseppi

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-20-2010 4:46 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-20-2010 5:07 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 155 of 325 (592555)
11-20-2010 5:20 PM
Reply to: Message 154 by Dawn Bertot
11-20-2010 5:07 PM


Re: Question everything
Dawn Bertot writes:
Would you kindly respond to refernce in 131 that I highlighted, because that is the argument and specific experiment I am saying would accomplish such a feat
I didn't ask what argument you would use. I asked what data you would collect, specifically. Would you weigh leaves? Would you test soil pH? I asked what equipment you would use, specifically. An infrared spectrometer? A gas-liquid chromatograph? I asked how you would analyze the results, specifically. Linear regression? Standard deviation?
Message 131 says nothing about that. You haven't devised a specific experiment or even hinted at one.
I'm not asking for vague descriptions of what a lab building looks like. I'm asking for specifics.

"It appears that many of you turn to Hebrew to escape the English...." -- Joseppi

This message is a reply to:
 Message 154 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-20-2010 5:07 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 192 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-20-2010 10:37 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 195 of 325 (592654)
11-20-2010 10:51 PM
Reply to: Message 192 by Dawn Bertot
11-20-2010 10:37 PM


Re: Question everything
Dawn Bertot writes:
How many test do i need to conduct to know it is order and harmony?
We're not talking about "order and harmony". We're talking about intelligent design.
And so far you haven't done any tests, you haven't described any tests, you haven't specified what you're testing for.
I'm asking you for one simple test that you would do to identify design. What would you be holding in your hands while you're doing the test?
So far, you've demonstrated that the ID method is fundamentally different from the scientific method because the scientific method does propose detailed experimental procdeures.

"It appears that many of you turn to Hebrew to escape the English...." -- Joseppi

This message is a reply to:
 Message 192 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-20-2010 10:37 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 196 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-20-2010 11:12 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 200 of 325 (592664)
11-20-2010 11:37 PM
Reply to: Message 196 by Dawn Bertot
11-20-2010 11:12 PM


Re: Question everything
Dawn Bertot writes:
If thats you in the picture, sorry doll face, yes we are talking about order and harmony
No we're not. Nobody disputes that order and harmony exist. What you're trying to do is establish a linkage between order and harmony on the one hand and design on the other hand.
We have something that exhibits order and harmony. Your hypothesis is that that order and harmony originate from a designer.
Your claim is that the ID method for testing that hypothesis is the same as the scientific method. The scientific method proposes experiments to test the hypothesis, so if your method is the same as the scientific method, that's what you need to do.
Dawn Bertot writes:
If what I provided is not a test could you give me an example of test that involves different and better principles
Certainly. I hypothesize that water is composed of hydrogen and oxygen in a ratio of 2 to 1 by volume. The equipment that I require is two test tubes, a source of electric current and a beaker of water. I propose to pass an electric current through the water and collect the separated hydrogen and oxygen gases in the test tubes, one over each electrode. If my hypothesis is correct, I will collect twice as much hydrogen as oxygen. I'll test the hydrogen (to a first approximation) by igniting it. I'll test the oxygen (to a first approximation) by inserting a glowing splint to see if it promotes combustion.
I've been asking you to describe a similar experiment in similar detail for distinguishing design from natural processes.

"It appears that many of you turn to Hebrew to escape the English...." -- Joseppi

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by Dawn Bertot, posted 11-20-2010 11:12 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 253 of 325 (592900)
11-22-2010 6:23 PM
Reply to: Message 251 by Buzsaw
11-22-2010 5:59 PM


Re: Applying The Scientific Method
Buzsaw writes:
There are some IDSM scientists applying the SM....
Name them. Cite their work. That's what this thread is for.

"It appears that many of you turn to Hebrew to escape the English...." -- Joseppi

This message is a reply to:
 Message 251 by Buzsaw, posted 11-22-2010 5:59 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 276 of 325 (593049)
11-23-2010 10:12 PM
Reply to: Message 269 by Buzsaw
11-23-2010 9:15 PM


Re: Applying The Scientific Method
Buzsaw writes:
You missed my valid point that conventional SM is incomplete whereas the metaphysical science methodology, call it MSM, is the complete science....
Just to clarify, you're saying that the ID method is not the same as the scientific method - i.e. you're disagreeing with Dawn Bertot.

"It appears that many of you turn to Hebrew to escape the English...." -- Joseppi

This message is a reply to:
 Message 269 by Buzsaw, posted 11-23-2010 9:15 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 278 by Buzsaw, posted 11-23-2010 10:34 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 439 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 282 of 325 (593065)
11-23-2010 10:55 PM
Reply to: Message 278 by Buzsaw
11-23-2010 10:34 PM


Re: Applying The Scientific Method
Buzsaw writes:
I believe Dawn and I agree on this.
I think that's quite possible. However, the claim that Dawn has made, the claim that Dawn is supposed to be defending in this thread, is that the ID method and the scientific method are the same. Claiming that the ID method is "better" is for another thread.
Edited by ringo, : Fixed quote attribution.

"It appears that many of you turn to Hebrew to escape the English...." -- Joseppi

This message is a reply to:
 Message 278 by Buzsaw, posted 11-23-2010 10:34 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024