Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 70 (9013 total)
52 online now:
Percy (Admin), Tangle (2 members, 50 visitors)
Newest Member: Ashles
Post Volume: Total: 882,087 Year: 13,835/23,288 Month: 27/326 Week: 47/92 Day: 10/17 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are any of these prophecies fulfilled by Jesus?
Theodoric
Member (Idle past 17 days)
Posts: 7051
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005


Message 22 of 255 (593906)
11-30-2010 11:32 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by ICdesign
11-30-2010 11:16 AM


So you give up?
I see you make no attempt to defend your assertions about prophecy. You and christians like you are why people are turned off from christianity. You make these wild promises and claims, but once anyone questions them you not only cannot defend them, but you then claim that your wild ass claims and promises cannot even be questioned.

You made a claim of 300 prophecies that Jesus met and yet you can not even defend one. You cannot even make a feeble defense.

You may have noticed this is in the science forums where evidence is required to support arguments. I guess you cannot put up so I guess you had better shut up.


Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by ICdesign, posted 11-30-2010 11:16 AM ICdesign has not yet responded

  
Theodoric
Member (Idle past 17 days)
Posts: 7051
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005


Message 23 of 255 (593907)
11-30-2010 11:33 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by jar
11-30-2010 11:29 AM


Re: Zechariah 9:9
Would you like for us to step through each of your new quote mined verses and look at them in context?

I think this would be a very helpful exercise for a lot of us here.

If you have the time and/or inclination it would be greatly appreciated.


Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by jar, posted 11-30-2010 11:29 AM jar has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by jar, posted 11-30-2010 12:04 PM Theodoric has not yet responded

  
Theodoric
Member (Idle past 17 days)
Posts: 7051
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005


Message 74 of 255 (594926)
12-05-2010 4:53 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by ICdesign
12-05-2010 4:36 PM


Re: I choose to believe...you choose not to
written 2010 years after....

Do you have any evidence for when this christ guy was supposedly born, or even know the time of year?

About as much evidence as your prophecy evidence?


Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by ICdesign, posted 12-05-2010 4:36 PM ICdesign has not yet responded

  
Theodoric
Member (Idle past 17 days)
Posts: 7051
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005


(3)
Message 176 of 255 (662648)
05-17-2012 4:16 PM
Reply to: Message 170 by ScottyDouglas
05-17-2012 2:26 PM


Re: British Regal Throne
When one traces the roots of the Britons, Scots, Irish, Welsh, English (Anglos and Saxons), Picts, Normans, and Celts, there is substantial evidence that all of those peoples are of Israelite descent.

Care to share any of this "substantial evidence"?

The Stone of Scone-The Stone of Scone, which is also known as the Stoneof Destiny and has had an extraordinarily elevated place in Irish,Scottish, English, British, Jewish, Muslim History, is a 26 incheslong, 16 inches wide, and 11 inches high block of yellowishsandstone, weighing 152 Kg and carved with a Latin Cross on top.

http://www.cai.org/bible-studies/davids-throne-found-britain

http://www.asis.com/users/stag/stone.html

Absolutely hilarious. Your links offer no evidence to back up these wild ass assertions. You do know what evidence is don't you?

This is my favorite assertion from your one link.

quote:
Though it might be suggested that George I was half-German, this is not so, for his father, Earnest Augustus of Hannover, and his grandfather, Frederick of Bohemia, were both descended from Odin and Frea. Odin (or Wodin) was descended from Calcol and Dardan, who were Zara-Judah's sons. Thus the alliance of Elisabeth and Sophia only strengthened the Judah line: thus, although some members of the Royal line resided in Germany for a period. German Kings never ruled Britain at any time.

Freaking priceless.

My next favorite is this.

quote:
The Royal College of Heralds in Britain accepts this direct line of descent from King David to Queen Elizabeth II as factual.

It is actually The College of Arms. Please show the source for this. The only sources I can find are fundie christian sites. Also, if there was a biblical King David and he had descendents that have survived then there is a chance that anyone alive now could be a descendent. It wouldn't be that special.

I am sure if this is true about the "Royal College of Heralds" then they must have done up a genealogy. Please provide it.

I am calling bullshit on this.

Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Fix "link" link. There was an extra space at the end of the url, before the "".


Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by ScottyDouglas, posted 05-17-2012 2:26 PM ScottyDouglas has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by ScottyDouglas, posted 05-17-2012 11:43 PM Theodoric has responded

  
Theodoric
Member (Idle past 17 days)
Posts: 7051
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005


Message 179 of 255 (662713)
05-18-2012 8:43 AM
Reply to: Message 177 by ScottyDouglas
05-17-2012 11:43 PM


Re: British Regal Throne
In other words your source lied. I see nothing from the College of Arms. All this is is ridiculous fundy nonsense. Lets see some documentation for this "genealogy"

As I stated before this is all crap with no evidence.


Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 177 by ScottyDouglas, posted 05-17-2012 11:43 PM ScottyDouglas has not yet responded

  
Theodoric
Member (Idle past 17 days)
Posts: 7051
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005


Message 186 of 255 (662766)
05-18-2012 3:42 PM
Reply to: Message 181 by ScottyDouglas
05-18-2012 2:52 PM


Where do you get this shit? Where ever you got this from is lying to you.

How about you just email the College of Arms and see what they tell you.

Enquiries

I am sure they will get back to you, once they get off the floor from laughing so hard.


Real meaning of the Coat of Arms.


Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by ScottyDouglas, posted 05-18-2012 2:52 PM ScottyDouglas has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by ScottyDouglas, posted 05-18-2012 3:53 PM Theodoric has responded

  
Theodoric
Member (Idle past 17 days)
Posts: 7051
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005


Message 190 of 255 (662780)
05-18-2012 4:58 PM
Reply to: Message 187 by ScottyDouglas
05-18-2012 3:53 PM


You, sir, are a nutball.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by ScottyDouglas, posted 05-18-2012 3:53 PM ScottyDouglas has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 191 by ScottyDouglas, posted 05-18-2012 5:08 PM Theodoric has not yet responded
 Message 192 by ScottyDouglas, posted 05-18-2012 5:13 PM Theodoric has not yet responded

  
Theodoric
Member (Idle past 17 days)
Posts: 7051
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005


Message 239 of 255 (722877)
03-25-2014 4:22 PM
Reply to: Message 236 by lokiare
03-25-2014 2:53 PM


Re: putting a date on prophecies
Bob doesn't know what the hell he is talking about. The Talmud references to a Yeshua are not in time and place with the bible Jesus. One says he was from 100 BCE the other 200-500 CE. All the references are from the 3rd century CE or later.

Here is some quick info
http://en.wikipedia.org/..._evidence_of_the_historical_Jesus

Josephus is years after and his writings even later. Josephus is not a primary source.

Kapyong, an ex-member here, had a great post that addressed these supposed historical references.
Message 8


Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 236 by lokiare, posted 03-25-2014 2:53 PM lokiare has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 242 by lokiare, posted 03-25-2014 5:05 PM Theodoric has responded

  
Theodoric
Member (Idle past 17 days)
Posts: 7051
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005


Message 247 of 255 (722914)
03-25-2014 5:46 PM
Reply to: Message 242 by lokiare
03-25-2014 5:05 PM


Re: putting a date on prophecies
So you expect us to read your sources, but ignore sources others present. YOu did not address my post you just poo pooed it. Classic and typical. You don't want to debate you want to preach.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by lokiare, posted 03-25-2014 5:05 PM lokiare has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020