Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 81 (9005 total)
69 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1, Hyroglyphx, Phat (AdminPhat) (4 members, 65 visitors)
Newest Member: kanthesh
Post Volume: Total: 881,153 Year: 12,901/23,288 Month: 626/1,527 Week: 65/240 Day: 28/4 Hour: 1/1

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures (aka 'The Whine List')
Larni
Member
Posts: 3998
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 260 of 1043 (633232)
09-13-2011 8:59 AM
Reply to: Message 255 by Adminnemooseus
09-12-2011 11:15 PM


Re: Considerations of "The Peanut Gallery"
I think the peanut gallery is a good idea in theory but it seems to wind off into it's own little world far too often.

Seem very 'chat roomy', to me.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 255 by Adminnemooseus, posted 09-12-2011 11:15 PM Adminnemooseus has acknowledged this reply

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 3998
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 267 of 1043 (633451)
09-14-2011 5:42 AM
Reply to: Message 266 by Adminnemooseus
09-14-2011 4:18 AM


Re: Some thoughts on my recent controversial admin actions
I completely agree with your position but your sentencing was a little harsh.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 266 by Adminnemooseus, posted 09-14-2011 4:18 AM Adminnemooseus has not yet responded

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 3998
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 318 of 1043 (641326)
11-18-2011 3:47 PM
Reply to: Message 316 by Artemis Entreri
11-18-2011 2:20 PM


Cats are good, m'kay?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.

Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 316 by Artemis Entreri, posted 11-18-2011 2:20 PM Artemis Entreri has not yet responded

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 3998
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 585 of 1043 (667502)
07-08-2012 1:15 PM
Reply to: Message 567 by Bolder-dash
06-08-2012 7:58 AM


Re: Wanted-New moderators, apply within
I would support you having a role as a Mod.

I agree with virtually nothing you have ever posted but that is not the point of a Mod: if you are objective you get my vote.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 567 by Bolder-dash, posted 06-08-2012 7:58 AM Bolder-dash has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020