Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8985 total)
41 online now:
Kleinman, PaulK, Straggler (3 members, 38 visitors)
Newest Member: Jerry Johnson
Post Volume: Total: 877,853 Year: 9,601/23,288 Month: 616/1,544 Week: 8/322 Day: 8/58 Hour: 2/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures (aka 'The Whine List')
Tram law
Member (Idle past 3259 days)
Posts: 283
From: Weed, California, USA
Joined: 08-15-2010

Message 120 of 1043 (612716)
04-17-2011 10:22 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by jar
03-22-2011 10:52 AM

Re: Moose Didn't Know + Brevity = Suspension
jar writes:

What a teacher tells you and what YOU learn on your own are quite different. Those that did not know about the Canary Island threat and did take the effort to look it up will very likely retain the knowledge far longer than those who were simply instructed.

The Coffee House is a place for discussion, not debate.

I personally find succinct preferable to verbose and brevity preferable to endless banter.

It looks like I helped a Moose learn two new things, and honestly, teaching an old moose new things is something to really be proud of.

So now I will attempt to teach an old Moose yet another new thing.

Posts that do not contain links cannot be a violation of Rule 5 that prohibits bare links.

Let me repeat this for the old Moose.

A post that does not have any links in it cannot be said to have bare links.

Next trite and without substance. I'm not quite sure how a blackout that effected much of the Northeast US and lots of Canada could be considered trite or without substance. Also, calling a potential tsunami that would effect all of the East coast of the US and Canada as well as parts of South America and Europe trite seems to me to be understating the issue.

Finally, let me address the fact that the posts were short, one liners.

In the first instance I was responding to a one line message, in the latter though I was responding to a multi-line post I will admit. Perhaps Mark Twain was wrong and I should use the word Metropolis even though I get paid the same for city.

However both posts were on topic, pertinent, introduced information that at least one Moose did not know or did not recognize.

Over the years I have had lot's of suspensions, a few that I even thought were deserved, but only once was I prouder of any suspensions than of these two. Fortunately or unfortunately, the number of suspensions still lags behind the number of POTMs, but I will try to build towards a balance.

The following question refers to the bolded part:

So what is the difference between discussion and debate?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by jar, posted 03-22-2011 10:52 AM jar has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by jar, posted 04-17-2011 10:26 PM Tram law has responded

Tram law
Member (Idle past 3259 days)
Posts: 283
From: Weed, California, USA
Joined: 08-15-2010

Message 123 of 1043 (612728)
04-18-2011 1:54 AM
Reply to: Message 121 by jar
04-17-2011 10:26 PM

Re: Moose Didn't Know + Brevity = Suspension
jar writes:

A discussion is not formal, not necessarily on a set subject, has greater freedom in format and presentation.

Debates are general more organized, with a very tightly set subject and procedures.

Thank you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by jar, posted 04-17-2011 10:26 PM jar has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020