Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8925 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 08-19-2019 5:12 PM
30 online now:
1.61803, AZPaul3, dwise1, Faith, JonF, RAZD, ringo, Tangle, Tanypteryx, Theodoric (10 members, 20 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Jedothek
Post Volume:
Total: 860,032 Year: 15,068/19,786 Month: 1,791/3,058 Week: 165/404 Day: 52/113 Hour: 0/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures (aka 'The Whine List')
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 143 of 1043 (621052)
06-23-2011 2:55 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by AZPaul3
06-21-2011 1:12 PM


Re: Fidelity
AZPaul3 writes:

Yes, I understand that. And it was trivial, not substantive, in nature.But that isn't the point, is it?You do know what the point is, don't you Moose?

If I can stick my nose in the conversation here, I personally think if Moose where to change the subject matter in your post THAT would be an issue. Also, since you referenced Him in the post as getting "moosed" He clearly did it in jest.

If Moose wasn't referenced at all, (as he was basically the "subject" of your comment) I seriously doubt He would be worried about changing any capitals you may have missed. It was only a "play" on your comment, and a good one at that. All he did was acknowledge the flattery you were offering Him. IMO.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by AZPaul3, posted 06-21-2011 1:12 PM AZPaul3 has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by AZPaul3, posted 06-23-2011 7:57 AM Chuck77 has not yet responded

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 287 of 1043 (634804)
09-24-2011 5:59 AM
Reply to: Message 286 by Panda
09-23-2011 9:41 PM


Re: Does "stalking" accomplish anything related to the topics?
Panda writes:

can you link examples of them stalking you?

Message 283

Message 286


This message is a reply to:
 Message 286 by Panda, posted 09-23-2011 9:41 PM Panda has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 288 by Theodoric, posted 09-24-2011 12:44 PM Chuck77 has responded

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 289 of 1043 (634949)
09-25-2011 1:48 AM
Reply to: Message 288 by Theodoric
09-24-2011 12:44 PM


Re: Does "stalking" accomplish anything related to the topics?
See below

Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 288 by Theodoric, posted 09-24-2011 12:44 PM Theodoric has not yet responded

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 290 of 1043 (634950)
09-25-2011 1:49 AM
Reply to: Message 288 by Theodoric
09-24-2011 12:44 PM


Re: Does "stalking" accomplish anything related to the topics?

Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 288 by Theodoric, posted 09-24-2011 12:44 PM Theodoric has not yet responded

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 307 of 1043 (638130)
10-20-2011 1:18 AM
Reply to: Message 306 by Omnivorous
10-20-2011 12:24 AM


Re: What's in a name?
For future reference, may I also reply to others' summaries in my summary?

Hmmm, I have an even better idea. How about you have one SINGLE post on a thread or you're not allowed a summation?

Seems reasonable to me ehe? Not one single post on the entire thread but your "summation" and I use the term loosely, and you're whining about me. Funny. Atleast I contributed.

You on the other hand? Not so much.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 306 by Omnivorous, posted 10-20-2011 12:24 AM Omnivorous has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 308 by Omnivorous, posted 10-20-2011 9:53 AM Chuck77 has not yet responded

  
Chuck77
Inactive Member


Message 334 of 1043 (645967)
01-01-2012 1:07 AM


I'm sorry but if Buz got suspended for his posts (which he shouldn't have been) then surley Theodoric should be suspended for this Message 190

If he's not suspended for this but Buz was for his(?) there's a problem.

BTW, Theodorics comments were in a non-evidence thread also.

(ABE after nwr's post for not wanting to make another entire post and some spelling) I don't think Theodore should be banned for his comment. I'm just drawing similarities in their posts and wondering why Buz is suspended and he's not. Forum rules are forum rules and apperantly Buz broke rule #1 and #4 but Theodoric didn't.

Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.


Replies to this message:
 Message 335 by nwr, posted 01-01-2012 1:16 AM Chuck77 has not yet responded
 Message 336 by anglagard, posted 01-01-2012 3:36 AM Chuck77 has not yet responded
 Message 340 by Theodoric, posted 01-01-2012 1:33 PM Chuck77 has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019