Yes, I understand that. And it was trivial, not substantive, in nature.But that isn't the point, is it?You do know what the point is, don't you Moose?
If I can stick my nose in the conversation here, I personally think if Moose where to change the subject matter in your post THAT would be an issue. Also, since you referenced Him in the post as getting "moosed" He clearly did it in jest.
If Moose wasn't referenced at all, (as he was basically the "subject" of your comment) I seriously doubt He would be worried about changing any capitals you may have missed. It was only a "play" on your comment, and a good one at that. All he did was acknowledge the flattery you were offering Him. IMO.
I'm sorry but if Buz got suspended for his posts (which he shouldn't have been) then surley Theodoric should be suspended for this Message 190
If he's not suspended for this but Buz was for his(?) there's a problem.
BTW, Theodorics comments were in a non-evidence thread also.
(ABE after nwr's post for not wanting to make another entire post and some spelling) I don't think Theodore should be banned for his comment. I'm just drawing similarities in their posts and wondering why Buz is suspended and he's not. Forum rules are forum rules and apperantly Buz broke rule #1 and #4 but Theodoric didn't.