Sorry, I'm much more interested in an examination of your misuse of the English language, and the many egregious errors you make in every post.
How about a discussion examining (some of) the alledged reasons for deconversion
Alleged, not "alledged."
Put a period at the end of sentences, or, if the sentence happens to be a question, a question mark.
An exploration into the individual justifications concerning these reasons.
Not a sentence, or as my English teachers used to put on my papers to save time, "NAS."
Against a Biblical perspective
NAS
This may not fly with Percy, I know not
Punctuation.
Well, let's review. In four sentences you made five errors. Not a very good average, eh Abbot?
Oh, and just to stay on topic, I do not believe in any deities because there's no evidence of any, just as there's no evidence that you can write coherently.
I can't wait for your next post in this thread.
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
™ Version 4.2